Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due to developer inactivity

2024-02-18 Thread Andreas Schürch
On 2/17/24 21:39, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: On 2024-02-14 10:49, Michał Górny wrote: net-dns/dnsdist I can proxymaint this since I occasionally report bugs/contribute to upstream. Will open a maintainer PR and version bump soon-ish. Thanks Holger, but I'm not retired and will retake maint

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due to developer inactivity

2024-02-17 Thread Holger Hoffstätte
On 2024-02-14 10:49, Michał Górny wrote: net-dns/dnsdist I can proxymaint this since I occasionally report bugs/contribute to upstream. Will open a maintainer PR and version bump soon-ish. cheers Holger

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: media-gfx/rawtherapee media-libs/libiptcdata

2023-02-24 Thread Ben Kohler
On 2/24/23 04:58, Marek Szuba wrote: In light of the current (proxied) maintainer having stated they no longer have a Linux desktop and therefore expect difficulties in continuing to maintain their packages, media-gfx/rawtherapee I will take this one unless anyone else is really passiona

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: sys-apps/bat, app-misc/physlock, dev-lang/crystal, dev-util/shards

2023-02-11 Thread Maciej Barć
dev-lang/crystal dev-util/shards Added myself as maint to both of those (and bumped them). On 2/11/23 22:48, Maciej Barć wrote: These packages are only used in ::guru, so they could be moved there. I think regular mask-remove process should apply. I am interested in crystal and might pick i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: sys-apps/bat, app-misc/physlock, dev-lang/crystal, dev-util/shards

2023-02-11 Thread Maciej Barć
These packages are only used in ::guru, so they could be moved there. I think regular mask-remove process should apply. I am interested in crystal and might pick it up. Co-maints welcome! :^) On 2/11/23 20:01, Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote: dev-lang/crystal dev-util/shards These package

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: sys-apps/bat, app-misc/physlock, dev-lang/crystal, dev-util/shards

2023-02-11 Thread Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova
> dev-lang/crystal > dev-util/shards These packages are only used in ::guru, so they could be moved there.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: app-eselect/eselect-wine, gui-libs/gtk-layer-shell ...

2022-07-24 Thread Conrad Kostecki
Hi! Am 24.07.2022 um 10:34 schrieb Joonas Niilola: net-libs/libcapi I will take this package. Conrad

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: x11-misc/lightdm, sys-apps/fwupd, net-im/pidgin, media-sound/mumble, app-emulation/virtualbox, app-editors/nano, app-shells/zsh and more

2022-06-29 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2022-06-29 08:15, Joonas Niilola wrote: acct-group/lightdm acct-user/lightdm app-admin/keepassxc mail-mta/msmtp sys-apps/gptfdisk sys-apps/lm-sensors sys-fs/ddrescue x11-misc/lightdm x11-misc/lightdm-gtk-greeter I'll take these. -- Marecki OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital s

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: x11-misc/lightdm, sys-apps/fwupd, net-im/pidgin, media-sound/mumble, app-emulation/virtualbox, app-editors/nano, app-shells/zsh and more

2022-06-29 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 29/06/2022 09.15, Joonas Niilola wrote: Packages up for grabs: … sys-libs/liburing I'd take this one. Co-maintainers welcome :) - Flow

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: e.g. www-servers/nginx, www-apps/nikola, app-admin/rsyslog, ...

2022-06-08 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2022-06-05 09:28, Joonas Niilola wrote: sys-process/incron I'll take this one, with Infra as fallback maintainers. -- Marecki OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: e.g. www-servers/nginx, www-apps/nikola, app-admin/rsyslog, ...

2022-06-05 Thread Conrad Kostecki
Hi! Am 05.06.2022 um 10:28 schrieb Joonas Niilola: Full list: net-libs/liboping Will also take that package, as it's a direct dep for collectd. Conrad

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: e.g. www-servers/nginx, www-apps/nikola, app-admin/rsyslog, ...

2022-06-05 Thread Jakov Smolić
On 6/5/22 10:28, Joonas Niilola wrote: sys-fs/ncdu I will take this one. -- Jakov

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: e.g. www-servers/nginx, www-apps/nikola, app-admin/rsyslog, ...

2022-06-05 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 05/06/2022 10.28, Joonas Niilola wrote: sys-block/hpssacli I grabbed this one. - Flow

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: e.g. www-servers/nginx, www-apps/nikola, app-admin/rsyslog, ...

2022-06-05 Thread Maciej Barć
dev-libs/libestr dev-libs/libfastjson I will probably take dev-libs/libestr & dev-libs/libfastjson which are (mainly) deps of app-admin/rsyslog. app-admin/rsyslog I could take app-admin/rsyslog but I fee like this might a bit too much for me, so for now only first two deps. On 6/5/22 1

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: e.g. www-servers/nginx, www-apps/nikola, app-admin/rsyslog, ...

2022-06-05 Thread Conrad Kostecki
Hi! Am 05.06.2022 um 10:28 schrieb Joonas Niilola: acct-group/collectd acct-group/nginx acct-user/collectd acct-user/nginx app-arch/rar app-metrics/collectd www-servers/nginx I could image of taking/helping with collectd, rar and nginx, as I am using those packages. As for nginx, we would rea

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: innoextract, emech, tigervnc, urxvtconfig

2021-02-23 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 2/21/21 3:54 PM, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > here are some packages up-for-grabs due to retirement of their maintainers. > b = bugs open, v = version bump available. > > app-arch/innoextract > net-irc/emech (b) > net-misc/tigervnc (b) > x11-misc/urxvtconfig (b) > In addition, app-text/di

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: innoextract, emech, tigervnc, urxvtconfig

2021-02-21 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 2/21/21 3:54 PM, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > here are some packages up-for-grabs due to retirement of their maintainers. > b = bugs open, v = version bump available. > > app-arch/innoextract > net-irc/emech (b) > net-misc/tigervnc (b) > x11-misc/urxvtconfig (b) > In addition, media-video/

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: innoextract, emech, tigervnc, urxvtconfig

2021-02-21 Thread John Helmert III
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 03:54:39PM +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > here are some packages up-for-grabs due to retirement of their maintainers. > b = bugs open, v = version bump available. > > app-arch/innoextract > net-irc/emech (b) > net-misc/tigervnc (b) Note that this one has a pretty

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: dev-erlang/*

2019-07-13 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
I have removed myself from maintainers and dev-erlang has no more maintainers. I removed myself from ejabberd maintainers as well, but that is still maintained by Hanno. Hanno, given that you are the only maintainer of ejabberd now, you may need to look at dev-erlang/* packages. I'm happy to help

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: net-news/rssguard,...

2018-07-19 Thread Johannes Huber
Am 18.07.2018 um 23:38 schrieb Jonas Stein: > ... > app-crypt/zulucrypt > app-admin/profile-cleaner > ... Took those two. Best regards, Johannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2018-03-10 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 03/11/2018 12:12 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: ... > net-irc/unrealircd I can take this one.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: app-misc/jail (perl)

2017-10-29 Thread Felix Janda
> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-misc/jail > > The proxied maintainer was also upstream. > > Jail is a Perl tool that builds a chroot and configures all the required > files, directories and libraries > https://github.com/spiculator/jail > > I do not understand why we need so many patc

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2017-06-28 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > I also want to drop the following: > > - dev-lang/erlang > - dev-vcs/hgsubversion I'll drop these to maintainer-needed by July 1st. Cheers, Dirkjan

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2017-03-27 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2017-03-26 21:50, aide...@gentoo.org wrote: > app-backup/burp I'll grab this one unless anyone minds. -- MS signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due to retirement

2017-01-01 Thread Thomas Kahle
On 01/01/2017 10:48, David Seifert wrote: > On Sat, 2016-12-31 at 22:54 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I will retire, so here are my remaining packages. Feel free to >> e-mail me any questions re this. sci-math is in CC because there >> are quite a few math packages. >> >> app-emacs/undo

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due to retirement

2017-01-01 Thread David Seifert
On Sat, 2016-12-31 at 22:54 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: > Hi, > > I will retire, so here are my remaining packages.  Feel free to > e-mail me any questions re this.  sci-math is in CC because there > are quite a few math packages. > > app-emacs/undo-tree > app-misc/anki > app-portage/tatt > app-te

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:33:15 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: > > so it is paused for a licensed > > download, as necessary, is not a show stopper > > The problem is that download requires a Browser with JavaScript > support, because it requires JavaScript to set a cookie, and that > cookie activate

Re: Easy Installs / Stage 4 ( Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs )

2016-08-07 Thread Jason Zaman
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:57:14PM -0500, james wrote: You should take a look at Blueness' Gentoo Reference stuff https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:RelEng_GRS https://blogs.gentoo.org/blueness/2015/07/31/the-gentoo-reference-system-suite-a-new-release-engineering-tool/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 00:26:01 -0500 james wrote: > so it is paused for a licensed > download, as necessary, is not a show stopper The problem is that download requires a Browser with JavaScript support, because it requires JavaScript to set a cookie, and that cookie activates the download workin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 10:22 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 16:49:01 -0500 james wrote: After that feat is accomplished, then a similar deployment of a gentoo cluster on a those just installed gentoo minimal images, via a few keystrokes (I am flexible on the cluster codes that comprise the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 16:49:01 -0500 james wrote: > After that feat is accomplished, then a similar deployment of a > gentoo cluster on a those just installed gentoo minimal images, via a > few keystrokes (I am flexible on the cluster codes that comprise the > cluster). Then (only after those 2 th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 03:48 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: Java works pretty well on Gentoo, I'm not quite sure what needs to be fixed ... I mean, apart from our insane idea to "build from source" which doesn't fit with the existing structures in the java ecosystem Wow!. Patrick, you are my hero. I have an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 08/07/2016 10:04 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 07/08/2016 19:36, james wrote: >>> The interesting apps out there are mostly running python, go and >>> (sometimes) lua. And that's what I observe in my day job - >>> business/mobile ISP. >> >> >> Look at the job listing on stackoverflow and elsewhe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 03:04 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 07/08/2016 19:36, james wrote: The interesting apps out there are mostly running python, go and (sometimes) lua. And that's what I observe in my day job - business/mobile ISP. Look at the job listing on stackoverflow and elsewhere (java) is very

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 07/08/2016 19:36, james wrote: >> The interesting apps out there are mostly running python, go and >> (sometimes) lua. And that's what I observe in my day job - >> business/mobile ISP. > > > Look at the job listing on stackoverflow and elsewhere (java) is very > popular when they list several

Re: Easy Installs / Stage 4 ( Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs )

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 11:55 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: Moving this to a higher visibility thread because I don't know how many people think such an intense discussion is happening in the tail of a package assignment . :P Most of my negativity/limitations are more about making sure we define where we au

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 12:49 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, james wrote: On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: Sounds great. What's stopping you? Why Rich, thanks for the triple compliments; is that a vote that the basic idea(s) have merit, or sarcasm? I'm just ex

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, james wrote: > On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> Sounds great. What's stopping you? >> > > Why Rich, thanks for the triple compliments; is that a vote that the basic > idea(s) have merit, or sarcasm? > I'm just expressing that the typical blocker i

Easy Installs / Stage 4 ( Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs )

2016-08-07 Thread Kent Fredric
Moving this to a higher visibility thread because I don't know how many people think such an intense discussion is happening in the tail of a package assignment . :P Most of my negativity/limitations are more about making sure we define where we aught to go. They're less "Limits", more "guide

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 11:21 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:24:37 -0500 james wrote: Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are teaching and promoting. I agree with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on gentoo-proper, but that sort of thing is killing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:24 AM, james wrote: As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3 months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an anything you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 09:09 AM, Consus wrote: On 08:24 Sun 07 Aug, james wrote: On 08/07/2016 02:38 AM, Consus wrote: On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote: Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the few la

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 09:06 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 07/08/2016 15:32, Kent Fredric wrote: Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are teaching and promoting. I agree with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on gentoo-proper, but that sort of thing is killing gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:24:37 -0500 james wrote: > >> Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are > >> teaching and promoting. I agree > >> with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on > >> gentoo-proper, but that sort of thing is killing gentoo and just > >> appears

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 08:32 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:24:51 -0500 james wrote: As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3 months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an anything y

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 07/08/16 19:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > dev-util/gource I can take this one.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:24 AM, james wrote: > > As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default > disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3 > months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an anything you want it to > be, but a few, common choic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Alec Ten Harmsel
On 8/7/2016 10:06 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: I have no idea where James gets his information from, but I suspect it's a niche market where uni students do "clustering" - whatever that is. Many of the new frameworks/servers that are developed for running or managing clusters are written in Java,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Consus
On 08:24 Sun 07 Aug, james wrote: > On 08/07/2016 02:38 AM, Consus wrote: > > On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it > > > still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the > > > few last developers retir

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 07/08/2016 15:32, Kent Fredric wrote: >> Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are >> > teaching and promoting. I agree >> > with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on gentoo-proper, >> > but that sort of thing is killing gentoo and just appears to the open >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:24:51 -0500 james wrote: > > As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default > disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3 > months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an anything you want > it to be, but a few, common

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread james
On 08/07/2016 02:38 AM, Consus wrote: On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote: Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the few last developers retired, and users long ago switched to the comparatively re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Consus
On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote: > Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it > still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the > few last developers retired, and users long ago switched to the > comparatively recent distribution of Debian stabl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-06 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 6 sierpnia 2016 23:12:55 CEST, Peter Stuge napisał(a): >Peter Stuge wrote: >> How can I help improve ..? > >Michał Górny wrote: >> people focused on preaching and/or implementing random crap-based >> solutions without even stopping for a few minutes to consider what >> we exactly need. > >You

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-06 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:28:19 + Peter Stuge wrote: > Michał Górny wrote: > > Or file a pull request @ https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pulls. > > That's the most convenient solution for most of proxy-maint team > > members. > > How can I help improve that problematic situation? > > It's not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > GitHub works for us. GitHub works for our contributors. GitHub boosts > our productivity, unlike those vain discussions. We don't have time for > all this tin foil hat nonsense. > Then just ignore it. If somebody wants to work on an alterna

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-06 Thread Peter Stuge
Peter Stuge wrote: > How can I help improve ..? Michał Górny wrote: > people focused on preaching and/or implementing random crap-based > solutions without even stopping for a few minutes to consider what > we exactly need. You could interpret my question as "what exactly do we need" ? > GitHub

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:47:09 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Or file a pull request @ https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pulls. > >> That's the most convenient solution for most of proxy-maint team members. > > > > How

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Michał Górny wrote: >> Or file a pull request @ https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pulls. >> That's the most convenient solution for most of proxy-maint team members. > > How can I help improve that problematic situation? > > It's not cool to grav

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-06 Thread Peter Stuge
Michał Górny wrote: > Or file a pull request @ https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pulls. > That's the most convenient solution for most of proxy-maint team members. How can I help improve that problematic situation? It's not cool to gravitate the project towards GitHub Inc. //Peter

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:04:08 + Peter Stuge wrote: > Felix Janda wrote: > > I'd like become a proxy-maintainer for app-editors/nvi. > > Sweet! If there are some open bugs then please upload patched ebuilds > and other neccessary files to the bugtracker, ideally as output by > git format-patc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-06 Thread Peter Stuge
Felix Janda wrote: > I'd like become a proxy-maintainer for app-editors/nvi. Sweet! If there are some open bugs then please upload patched ebuilds and other neccessary files to the bugtracker, ideally as output by git format-patch, and then talk e.g. to #gentoo-proxy-maint on freenode to get someo

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-06 Thread Felix Janda
I'd like become a proxy-maintainer for app-editors/nvi. --Felix

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-06-03 Thread james
On 06/03/2016 12:02 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: On 02/06/16 10:42 -0500, james wrote: On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages > anymore, they are all up for grabs. > > - media-gfx/openmesh [no project] >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-06-03 Thread Justin Bronder
On 02/06/16 10:42 -0500, james wrote: > On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: > > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages > > anymore, they are all up for grabs. > > > > - media-gfx/openmesh [no project] > > - sys-cluster/ganglia [cluster] > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2015-01-08 Thread Duncan
Duncan posted on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:28:02 + as excerpted: > Andrew Savchenko posted on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 04:29:42 +0300 as excerpted: > >> On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:06:08 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>> Done, this packages are now up for grabs: >> >>> net-proxy/privoxy >> >> I'll take them if

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2015-01-08 Thread Duncan
Andrew Savchenko posted on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 04:29:42 +0300 as excerpted: > On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:06:08 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: >> Done, this packages are now up for grabs: > >> net-proxy/privoxy > > I'll take them if there are no other people interested. If you are — > feel free to add yourse

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2014-12-03 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 12/03/2014 10:34 AM, Harvey wrote: > If your going to take on spacefm, it would be great if you also handled > udevil since they are both from the same upstream repo and work tightly > together.. > > I'm an avid user of both, and since upstream is no longer maintained on > either of these their

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2014-12-03 Thread Harvey
If your going to take on spacefm, it would be great if you also handled udevil since they are both from the same upstream repo and work tightly together.. I'm an avid user of both, and since upstream is no longer maintained on either of these their futures are unclear.. H On 11/27/2014 04:51 AM,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-24 Thread Duncan
Tom Wijsman posted on Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:18:07 +0200 as excerpted: > On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:27:19 + (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> Throwing hardware at the problem is usable now. > > If you have the money; yes, that's an option. > > Though I think a lot of people see Lin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-24 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:27:19 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > I have one; it's great to help make my boot short, but it isn't > > really a great improvement for the Portage tree. Better I/O isn't a > > solution to computational complexity; it doesn't deal with the CPU > > bottl

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-24 Thread Duncan
Tom Wijsman posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:24:27 +0200 as excerpted: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:33:53 + (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> TL;DR: SSDs help. =:^) > > TL;DR: SSDs help, but they don't solve the underlying problem. =:-( Well, there's the long-term fix to the underl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:07:57 +0200 Tom Wijsman wrote: > That's assuming you would go threaded, but you can also aim for lower > algorithmic complexities; the complexity makes the CPU the bottleneck. Dependency solving is NP-hard in theory and better than quadratic in practice. The resolution algo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-16 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:38:56 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:24:27 +0200 > Tom Wijsman wrote: > > I have one; it's great to help make my boot short, but it isn't > > really a great improvement for the Portage tree. Better I/O isn't a > > solution to computational complexity

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:24:27 +0200 Tom Wijsman wrote: > I have one; it's great to help make my boot short, but it isn't really > a great improvement for the Portage tree. Better I/O isn't a solution > to computational complexity; it doesn't deal with the CPU bottleneck. If the CPU is your bottlen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-16 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:33:53 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > TL;DR: SSDs help. =:^) TL;DR: SSDs help, but they don't solve the underlying problem. =:-( I have one; it's great to help make my boot short, but it isn't really a great improvement for the Portage tree. Better I/O i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-16 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 21:33:53 schrieb Duncan: > Tom Wijsman posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:23:24 +0200 as excerpted: > > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:21:38 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió: > >> [...] > >> > >> > Thank you for considering he

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-16 Thread Duncan
Tom Wijsman posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:23:24 +0200 as excerpted: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:21:38 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió: >> [...] >> > Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the >> > intricate details of pa

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-16 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 16/06/2013 23:02, g...@malth.us wrote: There'd be no problem resurrecting it from the grave, if need be, would there? Please note that being unmaintained does not mean the package will be removed. That would only happen if there are long term unresolved issues with the package. Best rega

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-06-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 12:03 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > Due elvanor lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: > app-office/openerp-server > net-print/xerox-drivers > media-gfx/iscan-plugin-gt-f720 > net-libs/pjsip > Also: app-office/openerp-client app-office/openerp-web

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-18 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le dimanche 17 février 2013 à 22:47 -0600, Ryan Hill a écrit : > Even after you do that it's hard to figure out what firmware files you > actually > need. I know I need iwl6000 firmware for Intel Ultimate-N 6300 wifi, but > linux-firmware contains: > > iwlwifi-6000-4.ucode > iwlwifi-6000g2a-5.uc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-18 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Ryan Hill schrieb: > He means that until you install the package with all firmware enabled you > don't > know what lines you need to put into the savedconfig file. > > Even after you do that it's hard to figure out what firmware files you > actually > need. I know I need iwl6000 firmware for Int

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-18 Thread Maxim Kammerer
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > He means that until you install the package with all firmware enabled you > don't > know what lines you need to put into the savedconfig file. I have posted a snippet previously — you basically search for "firmware=..." in kernel modules. It's

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-17 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:42:11 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > I would justify it through keeping things split and bit-exact clean, > instead of tightly integrated. > > Separate ebuilds mean that: > > - each firmware has proper license, > > - each firmware can be installed separately and it is _clea

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-17 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:40:10 +0100 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Peter Stuge schrieb: > > linux-firmware is okey but not great. The high resolution is there, which > > was my main concern, but > it's not so easy to know how to create a savedconfig without installing > the package. > > Ju

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-01-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 01/20/2013 05:30 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due swegener focusing in less packages until he has more time: > x11-misc/x11vnc -> maybe net-libs/libvncserver could be interested in > this > Yeah, I picked it up. As always, anyone is free to co-maintain if they like. signature.asc Description: O

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: prosody + lua deps

2012-12-31 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > dev-lua/lua-zlib: no other maintainers/herd > dev-lua/luadbi: no other maintainers/herd > dev-lua/luaevent: blueness, rafaelmartins > dev-lua/luaexpat: rafaelmartins > dev-lua/luasec: rafaelmartins > net-im/prosody: klausman, rafaelmartins

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-08 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 21:41:35 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alec Warner > wrote: > > Look, if you want to make a policy about the stuff, then make a > > policy, get council approval, and write it down. > > Don't make up silly half-solutions. > > Sure, but I'm not awa

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-02 Thread Duncan
Ian Stakenvicius posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 14:18:04 -0500 as excerpted: > ... a die in pkg_pretend is "fails to be permitted to emerge", not > "fails to build". And this would be essentially a p.mask but without it > using the portage p.mask (and its various connotations). Exactly. =:^) --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-02 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/12/12 03:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 02:20:07 + (UTC) Duncan > <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as >> excerpted: >> >>> And if we force some types of packages to

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-02 Thread Duncan
Michał Górny posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 09:35:45 +0100 as excerpted: > On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 02:20:07 + (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted: >> >> > And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-02 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 02:20:07 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted: > > > And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time, then > > what do we do if we actually need to mask them for removal or securi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-01 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alec Warner wrote: >> Look, if you want to make a policy about the stuff, then make a >> policy, get council approval, and write it down. >> Don't make up silly half-solutions. > > Sure, but I'm not aware of any

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > Look, if you want to make a policy about the stuff, then make a > policy, get council approval, and write it down. > Don't make up silly half-solutions. Sure, but I'm not aware of any policy at all concerning packages that contain bundled libra

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-01 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted: > >> And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time, then >> what do we do if we actually need to mask them for removal or security. >> Users

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-01 Thread Duncan
Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted: > And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time, then > what do we do if we actually need to mask them for removal or security. > Users won't even realize they have a known flaw, because they had to > unmask t

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs: prosody + lua deps

2012-11-26 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > I'd like to retire from these sometime soon: > > dev-lua/lua-zlib: no other maintainers/herd > dev-lua/luadbi: no other maintainers/herd > dev-lua/luaevent: blueness, rafaelmartins > dev-lua/luaexpat: rafaelmartins > dev-lua/luasec: rafae

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due bass retirement

2012-04-07 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:09:39 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 21:20 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió: > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:34:22 +0100 > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > > El dom, 18-03-2012 a las 23:56 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió: > > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:25:58 +0100 > > > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due mrness retirement

2012-04-07 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:02:17 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-util/dialogblocks > dev-util/helpblocks wxwidgets will take these. -- fonts, gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due bass retirement

2012-04-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 21:20 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:34:22 +0100 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > El dom, 18-03-2012 a las 23:56 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió: > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:25:58 +0100 > > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > > > > Due his retirement the following pa

  1   2   >