Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org said:
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Alec Warner wrote:
You should file a bug about that; I'm sure one of the portage guys
can change the crap code I wrote 4 years ago to use the normal
dependency checking code for installed atoms.
But we wouldn't know if users
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote:
Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix]
I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific
features) are allowed here.
run: emerge --oneshot $(qlist -IC kde-base/)
Is it guaranteed that your users have portage-utils
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote:
Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix]
I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific
features) are allowed here.
You should file a bug about that;
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Alec Warner wrote:
You should file a bug about that; I'm sure one of the portage guys
can change the crap code I wrote 4 years ago to use the normal
dependency checking code for installed atoms.
But we wouldn't know if users have the updated portage version
installed, so
On Thu, 19 May 2011 09:15:40 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think for a proper solution we would have to increase the number of
the News-Item-Format. Maybe even add a new header field for the EAPI.
Could just use an 'eapi' file in the news directory. Although does
Portage support
After a few years of masking, we will finally remove support for USE=kdeprefix
from all KDE ebuilds/eclasses on or about 2011-06-06, moving everyone to the
recommended FHS layout. The attached news item meant to serve as an early
warning to affected users.
I plan to commit this news item on