On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:55:00 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
> > there should be no more packages in the tree that have USE=tetex, so
> > this global USE flag can be removed. Any opinions?
>
> Go for it!
+1
And thanks aga
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
there should be no more packages in the tree that have USE=tetex, so
this global USE flag can be removed. Any opinions?
Great.
The following packages still depend on virtual/tetex:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
app-misc/tdl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
app-misc/fdu
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:46:22 +0200
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there should be no more packages in the tree that have USE=tetex, so
> this global USE flag can be removed. Any opinions?
>
> V-Li
>
> --
> Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
> http://www.gentoo
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> there should be no more packages in the tree that have USE=tetex, so
> this global USE flag can be removed. Any opinions?
Go for it!
Ulrich
Hi,
there should be no more packages in the tree that have USE=tetex, so
this global USE flag can be removed. Any opinions?
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://www.faulhammer.org/>
signature.asc
Description: