On 8 February 2013 00:31, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 8 February 2013 00:31, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, while in general I'm against renaming of licenses (e.g.,
it would be pointless to rename our GPL-2 to GPL-2.0 in
I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
our documentation pages and is the name in the SPDX license list [1],
So, while in general I'm against
On 7 February 2013 16:07, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
our documentation pages and is the
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
our documentation pages and is
