(I think it would be better if you could post the text on the list, so people
can easier cite the paragraphs they are referring to.)
I cite one situation which has actually led to system destruction:
I was in need of a certain version of a library. A the moment I installed it
initially, this
Klaus-J. Wolf wrote:
Hi,
I am new to this list, but I am not new to Gentoo.
Would you please discuss a GLEP draft, which I believe it might improve
the usability of Gentoo?
Text at:
http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
Technical details still missing...
Ignoring the
Klaus-J. Wolf wrote:
http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
* Manually keyword unmasking an ebuild, automatically means
unmasking the last one in the line of masked versions.
No. Use the = to unmask a specific version only. For example:
=sys-apps/findutils-4.2.25
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:11:07 +0100 Benno Schulenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Klaus-J. Wolf wrote:
| http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
|
|* Manually keyword unmasking an ebuild, automatically means
| unmasking the last one in the line of masked versions.
|
|
Hi,
I am new to this list, but I am not new to Gentoo.
Would you please discuss a GLEP draft, which I believe it might improve
the usability of Gentoo?
Text at:
http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
Technical details still missing...
Regards
k.j.
ps. I can also post the
On 2/10/06, Klaus-J. Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am new to this list, but I am not new to Gentoo.
Would you please discuss a GLEP draft, which I believe it might improve
the usability of Gentoo?
Text at:
http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
Seems like a huge
