Le 27/02/2009 06:32, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
bump. Can anyone help out here? Is it a license or a doc?
I would say it is in fact a license, but since all it seems to do is to
confirm that whatever GnuGk does under the GPLv2 is allowed, I wouldn't
necessarily put it in the license dir. But do i
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
Hi,
I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug
#258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see
h
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug
>> #258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see
>> http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug
> #258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see
> http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project
> (and users)
Hi,
I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug
#258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see
http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project
(and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under
GPL-2 and I was wonder
