On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 22:36 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 15:34, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Actually, this isn't exactly true. In the case of a compile fix, such
> > as this, the developer is aware of the issue, and gcc-porting@ is on the
> > bug, too, as CC, usually. I
On Thursday 08 June 2006 15:34, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Actually, this isn't exactly true. In the case of a compile fix, such
> as this, the developer is aware of the issue, and gcc-porting@ is on the
> bug, too, as CC, usually. If someone from gcc-porting were to go around
> committing patches
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:00:33PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> I just took a look at that. It's asking that you don't relay mail
> through dev.gentoo.org unless you can't send mail through your usual
> means of sending mail. For example, if your ISP blocks mail if the From:
> header indicates someth
Matteo Azzali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> * (I'm not sending mails through gentoo.org account cause
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/dev-email.xml asks me to
> not use it to send mails "unless absolutely necessary." , and I have
> others mean of sending emails.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> * (I'm not sending mails through gentoo.org account cause
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/dev-email.xml
> asks me to not use it to send mails "unless absolutely necessary." , and
> I have others mean of sending emails)
You should always use it on officia
Ehrm, I'm already becomed developer (some days) *,
I'm already the author of lots of patches/comment in those reports,
and as you pointed out I must follow rules and can't "jump" maintainers
(who surely have better understanding of the issue involved than me).
That's the cause of the question,my (
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 13:42 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> On 08/06/06, Matteo Azzali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hum, maybe my little english is not good to explain my thoughts.
> >
> > I already have a /usr/local/portage overlay bigger than 500Kb.
>
> I can beat that, try 23MB :-/
>
>
On 08/06/06, Matteo Azzali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hum, maybe my little english is not good to explain my thoughts.
I already have a /usr/local/portage overlay bigger than 500Kb.
I can beat that, try 23MB :-/
Anyway, back to your point - yes, there are lots of bugs with patches
attach
Hum, maybe my little english is not good to explain my thoughts.
I already have a /usr/local/portage overlay bigger than 500Kb.
What I was asking is if it's a normal behaviour that emerge "stops" for
unstable branch users.
I asked myself this after looking some ebuilds that have more than 4
Matteo Azzali wrote:
This is just a mine question, but it seems that since gcc-4.1 got it's
way into portage (~branch) things are getting slower.
Lots of the bugs blocking bug #117482 -
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117482 - have a patch in the report
or an ebuild for revision bump, te
This is just a mine question, but it seems that since gcc-4.1 got it's
way into portage (~branch) things are getting slower.
Lots of the bugs blocking bug #117482 -
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117482 - have a patch in the report
or an ebuild for revision bump, tested working.
They just
11 matches
Mail list logo
