Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=threads vs. USE=threadsafe

2008-06-03 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:37:40 +0200 Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You may also want to consider the following: > threadsonly [dev-libs/boost] > ithreads [sys-devel/libperl] > orathreads[dev-libs/libsqlora8] > frnothreads [net-dialup/freeradius] According to https://bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=threads vs. USE=threadsafe

2008-06-02 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:25:29 +0200 Christian Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we should be consistent here You may also want to consider the following: threadsonly [dev-libs/boost] ithreads [sys-devel/libperl] orathreads[dev-libs/libsqlora8] frnothreads [net-dialup/f

[gentoo-dev] USE=threads vs. USE=threadsafe

2008-06-02 Thread Christian Hoffmann
Heya, while I was emerging dev-libs/sqlite, I noticed that it uses USE=threadsafe to distinguish between threadsafe and non-threadsafe builds. While this is not strange per-se, lots of (?) other packages seem to make that decision based on USE=threads (dev-lang/php, dev-db/postgresql-base, ..