On 08/26/14 21:21, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/26/2014 06:23 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 08/26/14 17:00, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
On Tue Aug 26 22:27:36 2014 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I plan to update the
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:57:11 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
scanelf is the last line of defense. If we get there, paxctl and
paxctl-ng have failed, so we can't trust them really. Changing the
exit code for scanelf could cause other issues, eg in portage where
it is used
On 08/28/14 19:23, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:57:11 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
scanelf is the last line of defense. If we get there, paxctl and
paxctl-ng have failed, so we can't trust them really. Changing the
exit code for scanelf could cause other
Hi everyone,
I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass because of bug #520198. Can
people please review that bug and the latest suggestion for the eclass.
Since I'm inverting some if and for blocks, a diff isn't as useful as
just looking at the entire class.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo
On Tue Aug 26 22:27:36 2014 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass because of bug #520198. Can
people please review that bug and the latest suggestion for the eclass.
Since I'm inverting some if and for blocks, a diff isn't as
On 08/26/14 17:00, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
On Tue Aug 26 22:27:36 2014 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass because of bug #520198. Can
people please review that bug and the latest suggestion for the eclass.
Since I'm inverting some if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/26/2014 06:23 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 08/26/14 17:00, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
On Tue Aug 26 22:27:36 2014 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass because of bug #520198. Can
