On 11/16/19 4:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> More precisely, this is in context of dependency corrections. There is
> no need to go through stabilization to restrict too broad dependency
> specifications, while stable users hit the issue for the next two
> months.
>
The word "dependency" doesn'
On 11/16/19 8:55 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> This is in the context of revision bumps, not version bumps.
The things allowed in a revision bump are,
* New EAPI,
* Adding/dropping eclasses,
* Adding/dropping dependencies,
* Adding/dropping a phase function,
* Literally anything, excep
On Sat, 2019-11-16 at 14:55 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > Two things on that page are outright wrong:
> > 1. If the package has stable keywords, they should be moved to the
> > new revision without dropping. To commit the ebuild, re
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Two things on that page are outright wrong:
> 1. If the package has stable keywords, they should be moved to the
> new revision without dropping. To commit the ebuild, repoman
> commit --straight-to-stable option should be used.
>
On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 09:05 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 22:16 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > I'd like to share my frustration at the state of Python in general,
> > and Python packages in Gentoo. So I'd like to 'bootstrap' python3_8 --
> > that is, add it to the most common
On 2019-11-13 4:16 p.m., Michał Górny wrote:
[ Snip! ]
Can automation help with this at all, or is automation being used
already?
Also to clarify, is the issue here the way that we specify python
versions syntactically in all of the ebuilds in the repo, or is it
just the way the dependency
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:05 AM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 22:16 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > I'd like to share my frustration at the state of Python in general,
> > and Python packages in Gentoo. So I'd like to 'bootstrap' python3_8 --
> > that is, add it to the most common
В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 15:19:31 MSK пользователь Michael
Orlitzky написал:
> On 11/15/19 7:04 AM, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> > As i remember some decades ago policy was: revbump needed if you change
> > chnages stuff installed on filesystem. So in case of py addition it is.
On 11/15/19 7:22 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/ebuild-revisions/index.html
>
Two things on that page are outright wrong:
1. If the package has stable keywords, they should be moved to the new
revision without dropping. To commit the ebuild, rep
On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 15:04 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 13:47:12 MSK пользователь Mart
> Raudsepp
> написал:
> > Ühel kenal päeval, R, 15.11.2019 kell 13:20, kirjutas Alexey 'Alexxy'
> >
> > Shvetsov:
> > > В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г
On 11/15/19 7:04 AM, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
>
> As i remember some decades ago policy was: revbump needed if you change
> chnages stuff installed on filesystem. So in case of py addition it is. So
> what
> changed?
>
> Are there some new written rules that says in what case you need
В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 13:47:12 MSK пользователь Mart Raudsepp
написал:
> Ühel kenal päeval, R, 15.11.2019 kell 13:20, kirjutas Alexey 'Alexxy'
>
> Shvetsov:
> > В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 11:45:32 MSK пользователь
> > Michał Górny
> >
> > написал:
> > > On Fri, 2019-
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 15.11.2019 kell 13:20, kirjutas Alexey 'Alexxy'
Shvetsov:
> В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 11:45:32 MSK пользователь
> Michał Górny
> написал:
> > On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 11:41 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> > > I think problem is more global:
> > > * many pyt
В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 11:45:32 MSK пользователь Michał Górny
написал:
> On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 11:41 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> > I think problem is more global:
> > * many python3_6 packages dont have python3_7 keywords, because its
> > maintainers dont bother about
On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 11:41 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> I think problem is more global:
> * many python3_6 packages dont have python3_7 keywords, because its
> maintainers dont bother about it. So if you want to switch to python3_7 you
> still need manualy add python3_7 use for man
I think problem is more global:
* many python3_6 packages dont have python3_7 keywords, because its
maintainers dont bother about it. So if you want to switch to python3_7 you
still need manualy add python3_7 use for many packages (that actualy work
without problems
* we need policy for python
On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 22:16 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> I'd like to share my frustration at the state of Python in general,
> and Python packages in Gentoo. So I'd like to 'bootstrap' python3_8 --
> that is, add it to the most common dependency, dev-python/setuptools.
> Simple thing, right?
>
Hi,
I'd like to share my frustration at the state of Python in general,
and Python packages in Gentoo. So I'd like to 'bootstrap' python3_8 --
that is, add it to the most common dependency, dev-python/setuptools.
Simple thing, right?
1. There's no such thing as trivial dependency graph in Pyth
18 matches
Mail list logo
