[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-08-23 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11404 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-08-23 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11406 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-08-28 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11702 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-09-04 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11795 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-09-11 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12219 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-09-18 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12071 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-09-25 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12116 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-10-02 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12916 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-10-24 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13694 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-10-30 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13782 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-11-07 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13748 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-11-13 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14406 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-11-21 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14544 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-11-28 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14890 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-12-05 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14377 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-12-12 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13568 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-12-19 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13634 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-12-25 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14140 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-12-31 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13875 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-01-01 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13904 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-01-08 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13973 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-02-25 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14485 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-02-26 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14452 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-03-06 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14535 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-03-13 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14662 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-03-19 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14731 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-03-26 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14963 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-04-02 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15047 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-04-09 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14512 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-04-16 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14762 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-04-23 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14970 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-05-01 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15060 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-05-07 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15227 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-05-14 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15388 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-05-21 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15456 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-05-28 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15470 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-06-04 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15551 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-06-11 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15545 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-06-18 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15664 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-06-25 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15763 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-07-02 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15968 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-09-12 Thread Anthony Gorecki
On Sunday, September 11, 2005 20:42, Daniel Ahlberg wrote: > The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. Why does this script no longer include the results in the actual message? It was helpful to have both as a reference source. -- Anthony Gorecki Ectro-Li

Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-10-07 Thread Rajiv Aaron Manglani
hi. any way to change the form on this page to handle GET instead of POST ? that way we could bookmark searches. thanks. On Oct 2, 2005, at 11:47 PM, Daniel Ahlberg wrote: Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12916

Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-11-07 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 07 November 2005 09:08, Daniel Ahlberg wrote: > The database is updated once a day and this email is sent once a week. > Questions and comments may be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] As you told ;) I was wondering if you could add a couple of checks for Gentoo/ALT compatibility... not the

Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-11-14 Thread Andrej Kacian
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:12:25 +0100 (CET) Daniel Ahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is an automatically created email message. > http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14406 ebuilds. Just FYI, it doesn't display correctly in Opera - I can provide screenshots if you want

Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-04-10 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote: > * if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmetic). Why is this one bad? It creates some flexibility, and has the name of the package in one place only. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.n

Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-06-12 Thread Thilo Bangert
this is a nifty tool - thanks! > * if ebuild has $HOMEPAGE in SRC_URI (cosmetic). hhm - just started using it, as i thought it was a nice way to reduce redundancy, but perhaps not :P www-servers/lighttpd-1.4.11 www-servers/lighttpd-1.4.3 www-servers/lighttpd-1.4.5 how old is the base of

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords - how can we help?

2006-07-26 Thread Richard Fish
On 7/2/06, Daniel Ahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15968 ebuilds. A question [1] has come up on -user about why some ebuilds take so long to become stable for an arch. This isn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords - how can we help?

2006-07-26 Thread Drake Wyrm
Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A question [1] has come up on -user about why some ebuilds take so > long to become stable for an arch. > So my question is: is there anything that interested users can do to > help here? I know we can file stabilization bugs, but I agree with > Robert [1