On Sunday 27 May 2012 14:12:46 Samuli Suominen wrote:
Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed suit in
our virtual/libusb:1.
sad that we can't get these things merged. maybe we need to convince dsd to
hand over the reigns ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Hi Mike, list,
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed
suit in our virtual/libusb:1.
sad that we can't get these things merged. maybe we need to
convince dsd to hand over the reigns ?
It seems that some don't know that dsd made me
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 17:41:18 Peter Stuge wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed
suit in our virtual/libusb:1.
sad that we can't get these things merged. maybe we need to
convince dsd to hand over the reigns ?
It seems that
El dom, 27-05-2012 a las 17:16 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 05/27/2012 11:12 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed suit in
our virtual/libusb:1.
Debian is considering the switch also. We'll see...
I've been in contact with the new
On 05/28/2012 02:02 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 27-05-2012 a las 17:16 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 05/27/2012 11:12 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed suit in
our virtual/libusb:1.
Debian is considering the switch also. We'll see...
Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed suit in
our virtual/libusb:1.
Debian is considering the switch also. We'll see...
I've been in contact with the new maintainer, and he assured me the
compability will be kept for libusb-compat.
Happy testing,
# emerge -C
On 05/27/2012 11:12 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed suit in
our virtual/libusb:1.
Debian is considering the switch also. We'll see...
I've been in contact with the new maintainer, and he assured me the
compability will be kept for
