On Monday 09 May 2005 02:23 pm, Phil Richards wrote:
> On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> > > > There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IM
On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> > > There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
> > dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated t
On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> > There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
>
> dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't
> categories contain the '+' char? e.
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
I know it's a bit late for this, but I'm slowly catching up on my unread
emails:
dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't
categories contain the
On Friday 06 May 2005 19:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> as lead games dev i think media-libs makes sense
I'd prerfere base-system in this case ;)
> ha trumped you !
*speak of something with sed*
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.o
On Friday 06 May 2005 11:44 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 06 May 2005 17:38, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > yes, it is just a driver (and then some) for the frame buffer ... but
> > what do you do with the fb other than play media ? :):)
>
> Games? Something-other-than-media-which-is-
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Alin Nastac wrote:
>
> >Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> >>Why is language a good way to sort these? I think they should be sorted
> >>by function.
>
>
> >prolly 'cause C++ libraries cannot be used unless your program is
> >written in C++.
> >on the contrary, C libs could be use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Walker wrote:
> Hey guys/gals,
>
> There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
>
> dev-libs/socketstream
If you are moving that one to dev-cpp, then you may want to move:
net-libs/socket++ along with it.
Mark
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alin Nastac wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>Why is language a good way to sort these? I think they should be sorted
>>by function.
>
>
> prolly 'cause C++ libraries cannot be used unless your program is
> written in C++.
> on the contrary, C libs c
On Friday 06 May 2005 17:38, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> yes, it is just a driver (and then some) for the frame buffer ... but what
> do you do with the fb other than play media ? :):)
Games? Something-other-than-media-which-is-not-yet-present? :)
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo
On Friday 06 May 2005 11:25 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 06 May 2005 17:19, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > although DirectFB and friends would prob make more sense under say
> > 'media-libs' ?
>
> Why media? Seems more like drivers, about DirectFB, than media-libs.
yes, it is just a
On Friday 06 May 2005 17:19, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> although DirectFB and friends would prob make more sense under say
> 'media-libs' ?
Why media? Seems more like drivers, about DirectFB, than media-libs.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" PettenÃ
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http:/
On Thursday 05 May 2005 11:41 pm, Aaron Walker wrote:
> dev-libs/DFB++
i'd like to keep this with DirectFB which has a bunch of packages all in
dev-libs
although DirectFB and friends would prob make more sense under say
'media-libs' ?
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Friday 06 May 2005 10:33 am, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Aaron Walker wrote:
> > Hey guys/gals,
> >
> > There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
>
> Why is language a good way to sort these? I think they should be sorted
> by function.
i'd agree but i'm a bit apath
On Friday 06 May 2005 16:33, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Why is language a good way to sort these? I think they should be sorted
> by function.
I think this applies only to general-purpose libraries and not to all the
libraries.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" PettenÃ
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video,
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Aaron Walker wrote:
>
> >Hey guys/gals,
>
> >There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
>
>
> Why is language a good way to sort these? I think they should be sorted
> by function.
prolly 'cause C++ libraries cannot be used unless your progr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Walker wrote:
> Hey guys/gals,
>
> There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
Why is language a good way to sort these? I think they should be sorted
by function.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey guys/gals,
There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
dev-libs/asyncresolv
dev-libs/blitz
dev-libs/boost
dev-libs/botan
dev-libs/cgicc
dev-libs/commonc++
dev-libs/crypto++
dev-libs/darts
dev-libs/DFB++
dev-libs/dvcg
18 matches
Mail list logo
