-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| On Thursday 12 May 2005 02:40 pm, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
|
|>Why does get_number_of_jobs
|
|
| it's an old hack that should be punted ... it's only used by glibc/gcc
now, i
| just havent gotten around to removing it
will be grea
Rafael EspÃndola wrote:[Thu May 12 2005, 02:40:46PM EDT]
> Why does get_number_of_jobs reduces the number of parallel jobs to "to
> ensure successful merge"? In my humble opinion if a package fails to
> compile with a large -j then the ebuild should know the limit and
> reduce it.
Nope, if
On Thursday 12 May 2005 02:40 pm, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
> Why does get_number_of_jobs
it's an old hack that should be punted ... it's only used by glibc/gcc now, i
just havent gotten around to removing it
there's some parallel build issues in glibc, i just havent gotten up the guts
to track i
Why does get_number_of_jobs reduces the number of parallel jobs to "to
ensure successful merge"? In my humble opinion if a package fails to
compile with a large -j then the ebuild should know the limit and
reduce it.
An example of the problem: My machine has one processor but there are
many icecc
