On Tuesday 02 October 2012 15:53:41 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 17 August 2012 23:31:36 Mike Frysinger wrote:
with glibc-2.15 gone stable, it's time to get 2.16 in the pipe. the big
issues have been sorted out already. there's a few packages still known
to build fail, but they've had
On 30/10/2012 00:22, Mike Frysinger wrote:
reminder: plan on landing this week. glibc-2.17 is in the process of shaking
out upstream.
*shrug* we've got the warning so it's fair for it to land. I recommend
people who're using ~arch to mask it on their systems for a short while
though, as we
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 30/10/2012 00:22, Mike Frysinger wrote:
reminder: plan on landing this week. glibc-2.17 is in the process of shaking
out upstream.
*shrug* we've got the warning so it's fair for it to land. I recommend
On 30/10/2012 08:21, Rich Freeman wrote:
That might warrant a news item. Sure, they're ~arch, but they're not
going to know about this unless somebody tells them.
Is it just my impression or did you just volunteer? ;)
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu —
On Friday 17 August 2012 23:31:36 Mike Frysinger wrote:
with glibc-2.15 gone stable, it's time to get 2.16 in the pipe. the big
issues have been sorted out already. there's a few packages still known to
build fail, but they've had quite some time to sort their stuff out, so i
don't see
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday 19 August 2012 04:41:17 Luca Barbato wrote:
On 8/18/12 5:31 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'll probably land it later this weekend/monday.
Would be nice having a list of bugs open so people might have a look and
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday 19 August 2012 04:41:17 Luca Barbato wrote:
On 8/18/12 5:31 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'll probably land it later this weekend/monday.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think part of Mike's point is that time and time again has proven
that the way to a mans heart^H^H^H^H to get things fixed is to break
them. The aforementioned example of a tracker open for months with no
progress is an
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think part of Mike's point is that time and time again has proven
that the way to a mans heart^H^H^H^H to get things fixed is to break
them. The
On 8/18/12 5:31 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'll probably land it later this weekend/monday.
Would be nice having a list of bugs open so people might have a look and
see if there is something big left.
boost and gnutls seem big enough already to spend some time to get those
fixed before
On Sunday 19 August 2012 04:41:17 Luca Barbato wrote:
On 8/18/12 5:31 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'll probably land it later this weekend/monday.
Would be nice having a list of bugs open so people might have a look and
see if there is something big left.
we've been making trackers for the
On 19/08/2012 20:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
gnutls is not valid and i will not wait for it. boost i'll give the
maintainer time to resolve as the patch to boost-1.49 can be made to work,
but
it's not that great, and there are already plans on moving boost-1.50 to
unstable which is all i
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use 1.50
is purely the boost's maintainers choice.
[...]
there's a trivial patch long been available that you've refused to merge. so
any errors
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Tiziano Müller dev-z...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm already working on some of the boost-1.49/50 breakages and 1.51 is
already in the pipeline, so 1.50 has to leave p.mask in a month or so
anyway.
Thanks, at least somebody's doing something to help.
By the way I
On Saturday 18 August 2012 02:01:12 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use
1.50 is purely the boost's maintainers choice.
[...]
there's a trivial patch
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
yes, the patch here is trivial. it removes 1 line of unused code and has
fixed
a lot of other packages. deflecting the argument to a flawed system of your
own
creation doesn't change it. if you're worried about
*yawn* such a drama queen.
i never said i am going to do this everyone else be damned. i did say i
will probably do this soon. but that is why i posted to gentoo-dev in the
first place -- to get feedback from others.
gnutls breakage: not relevant. you're causing that breakage by not adding
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:00:17 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
*yawn* such a drama queen.
i never said i am going to do this everyone else be damned. i did
say i will probably do this soon. but that is why i posted to
gentoo-dev in the first place -- to get feedback from
with glibc-2.15 gone stable, it's time to get 2.16 in the pipe. the big
issues have been sorted out already. there's a few packages still known to
build fail, but they've had quite some time to sort their stuff out, so i don't
see delaying further making a difference there. if anything,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
there's a few packages still known to
build fail, but they've had quite some time to sort their stuff out, so i
don't
see delaying further making a difference there.
So you're saying you're fine to break:
- everything
On Saturday 18 August 2012 01:16:29 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
- everything depending on boost (current 1.49 won't work, you need
1.50, and quite a few things break with 1.50);
there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use 1.50
is purely the boost's maintainers
Am Samstag, den 18.08.2012, 01:44 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
On Saturday 18 August 2012 01:16:29 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
- everything depending on boost (current 1.49 won't work, you need
1.50, and quite a few things break with 1.50);
there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work.
22 matches
Mail list logo
