All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the default package the virtual will
bring in is stable everywhere?
I'm thinking I can take the virtual straight to stable
On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the default package the virtual will
bring in is stable everywhere?
I'm
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:17:28PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the
On 07/06/2011 09:55 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the default package the virtual will
bring in is stable everywhere?
I'm
On 06.07.2011 22:45, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:17:28PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, William Hubbs wrote:
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the default package the virtual will
bring in is stable everywhere?
I'm thinking I
