Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'm not going to fix just the path issue, i'm going to do em both in one sweep
-mike
Well, you won't find me complaining. ;-)
--
Jeff Walter
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thursday 12 April 2007, Jeff Walter wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > this package has always sucked ... it needs to be punted for the newer
> > one at http://dmitry.butskoy.name/traceroute
>
> Well, that's a separate subject all together. I'm just talking about
> placement of the binary.
i'm
On Thursday 12 April 2007, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> You should (also) fix net-misc/iputils for /usr/sbin/traceroute6
yes
> maybe it's better to create a dedicate ebuild for traceroute6?
no
-mike
pgphDuLQKdIMc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Rob C wrote:
Although Jonathan is correct in pointing out that you can modify the
search path, this is not really a valid response...
Traceroute is heavily used by many people and therefore I don't think
its reasonable to place it somewhere in the file system that a typical
user does not have
Mike Frysinger wrote:
this package has always sucked ... it needs to be punted for the newer one at
http://dmitry.butskoy.name/traceroute
-mike
:-)
Well, that's a separate subject all together. I'm just talking about placement
of the binary.
--
Jeff Walter
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis
Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
> On Thursday 12 April 2007, Jeff Walter wrote:
>> I can understand traceroute being setuid, but why put it in /usr/sbin so
>> only root sees it? If we only want root to run it, it doesn't need to be
>> setuid. It just doesn't make sense for a setuid application to only
On Thursday 12 April 2007, Jeff Walter wrote:
> I can understand traceroute being setuid, but why put it in /usr/sbin so
> only root sees it? If we only want root to run it, it doesn't need to be
> setuid. It just doesn't make sense for a setuid application to only be
> directly available to root
On 12/04/07, Jonathan Adamczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff Walter wrote:
>
> I can understand traceroute being setuid, but why put it in /usr/sbin
> so only root sees it?
Huh? Just add /usr/sbin to your PATH.
$ export PATH=$PATH:/usr/sbin
$ traceroute
Version 1.4a12
Usage: traceroute
On 4/12/07, Jonathan Adamczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff Walter wrote:
>
> I can understand traceroute being setuid, but why put it in /usr/sbin
> so only root sees it?
That is not a clean solution. Do we have to presume that traceroute
has to be used like ifconfig, or is it the real
Jeff Walter wrote:
I can understand traceroute being setuid, but why put it in /usr/sbin
so only root sees it?
Huh? Just add /usr/sbin to your PATH.
$ export PATH=$PATH:/usr/sbin
$ traceroute
Version 1.4a12
Usage: traceroute [-dFInrvx] [-g gateway] [-i iface] [-f first_ttl]
[-m max_
I just emerge'd traceroute, dropped back to my normal user, and it didn't run.
So, I checked the emerge messages and saw this:
* >>> SetUID: [chmod go-r]
/var/tmp/portage/net-analyzer/traceroute-1.4_p12-r5/image//usr/sbin/traceroute
...
[ ok ]
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
