You don't have to care, Alin. Mips is not among the security-wise supported¹
architectures.
Then only problem I see in general is, that every single subproject defines
what is supported and the information is scattered on the different
gentoo.org documentation pages (release, security, kernel,.
Alin Nastac wrote:
> Given the lack of interest manifested by mips team regarding
> net-proxy/squid and its security bumps, I propose to remove the last
> mips-stable version of this package - 2.5.10-r2 - marked as such by
> hardave on September the 4th 2005.
As a member of the MIPS team, I take o
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>On Friday 06 January 2006 08:07, Alin Nastac wrote:
>
>
>>Given the lack of interest manifested by mips team regarding
>>net-proxy/squid and its security bumps, I propose to remove the last
>>mips-stable version of this package - 2.5.10-r2 - marked as such by
>>hardave on
On Friday 06 January 2006 08:07, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Given the lack of interest manifested by mips team regarding
> net-proxy/squid and its security bumps, I propose to remove the last
> mips-stable version of this package - 2.5.10-r2 - marked as such by
> hardave on September the 4th 2005.
>
> Ob
Given the lack of interest manifested by mips team regarding
net-proxy/squid and its security bumps, I propose to remove the last
mips-stable version of this package - 2.5.10-r2 - marked as such by
hardave on September the 4th 2005.
Objections anyone?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
