On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:51:44 +0100
Sven Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A good start could be to do that the quick and ugly way, thanks
>> to Google (with some "site:www.gentoo.org/some/thing/" and other
>> black magic in the query terms).
> [...]
> - Google bases its search functionality
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 06:51:44PM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:53:22AM +0100, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> > A good start could be to do that the quick and ugly way, thanks to
> > Google (with some "site:www.gentoo.org/some/thing/" and other black
> > magic in
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:53:22AM +0100, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> A good start could be to do that the quick and ugly way, thanks to
> Google (with some "site:www.gentoo.org/some/thing/" and other black
> magic in the query terms).
[...]
Two major obstacles are
- Google bases its sea
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:04:53 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> or you could make it the dropdown list so people can pick
> bugs.gentoo.org/gentoo.org/forums.gentoo.org/whatever
Exactly, that's what i would like too. More specificaly, it
could be something like this:
http://tdegre
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:09:44AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Luis F. Araujo wrote:
>
> > I agree. Why we don't use that original design? , i think removing all that
> > vertical scrolling for the front page is a good thing, and the search
> > box looks
> > handy too.
>
> They would need to
Luis F. Araujo wrote:
> I agree. Why we don't use that original design? , i think removing all that
> vertical scrolling for the front page is a good thing, and the search
> box looks
> handy too.
They would need to coordinate with infra on how they would like to
implement a search function. For
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 01:32, Corey Shields wrote:
> On Monday 21 November 2005 01:07 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > I thought that Daniel was taking the red bubble letters. I also
> > remember the discussion about the infinity logo way back then and the
> > decision was made to keep it. Fo
On Monday 21 November 2005 15:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> - the 'about' blurb has way too much vertical spacing == wasted
agreed
> - the bar at the top which blathers on about what Gentoo has to offer
> i could do without completely (imo, you can read the About page)
> - if people insist on keepi
Grant Goodyear wrote:
It's interesting to compare http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org/ with
http://www.aaronshi.com/gentoo/mainindex.html. One of the things that I
always liked about the original design was the fact that the front page
held a considerable amount of information without needing much ve
On Monday 21 November 2005 10:08 pm, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 22/11/2005-12:05:38(+0900): Георги Георгиев types
>
> >
> >
>
> That ought to be
>
> of course.
or you could make it the dropdown list so people can pick
bugs.gentoo.org/gentoo.org/forums.gentoo.org/whatever
-mike
--
gent
maillog: 22/11/2005-12:05:38(+0900): Георги Георгиев types
>
>
That ought to be
of course.
--
(* Georgi Georgiev (* Mr and Mrs PED, can I borrow 26.7% of the (*
*)[EMAIL PROTECTED]*) RAYON TEXTILE production of the INDONESIAN *)
(* http://www.gg3.net/ (* archipelago?
maillog: 22/11/2005-03:53:22(+0100): Thomas de Grenier de Latour types
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:11:14 +
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:53:01AM +0100, Ingo Bormuth wrote:
> > >
> > > - Where is the "Search for __ in section __" field ? I
>
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:11:14 +
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:53:01AM +0100, Ingo Bormuth wrote:
> >
> > - Where is the "Search for __ in section __" field ? I
> > would expect it somewhere on the top. See http://php.net for a
> > good and tiny
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:53:01AM +0100, Ingo Bormuth wrote:
>
> - Where is the "Search for __ in section __" field ? I would expect it
> somewhere on the top. See http://php.net for a good and tiny one.
ah, excellent idea ... we get people who ask for this from time to time
in bugzil
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 06:14:15PM -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> One of the things that I always liked about the original design was
> the fact that the front page held a considerable amount of
> information without needing much vertical scrolling.
on that note, here is another opinion of mine th
- Where is the "Search for __ in section __" field ? I would expect it
somewhere on the top. See http://php.net for a good and tiny one.
- I like the infinity sign. It looks cool and professionel (not too commercial).
- I don't like the big, purple bar (portage, packages, get gentoo,
On Monday 21 November 2005 01:07 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> I thought that Daniel was taking the red bubble letters. I also
> remember the discussion about the infinity logo way back then and the
> decision was made to keep it. For one, it is very easy to print,
I thought that the vote was fo
It's interesting to compare http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org/ with
http://www.aaronshi.com/gentoo/mainindex.html. One of the things that I
always liked about the original design was the fact that the front page
held a considerable amount of information without needing much vertical
scrolling. On the
On Monday 21 November 2005 18:24, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> The infinity design makes us look like a bunch of ricers. Kill it!
+1
not like I love the red letters... (the 'g' actually makes it similar to
G/FBSD logo, never noted that before)...
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The infinity design makes us look like a bunch of ricers. Kill it!
+1
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 15:35 -0500, A. Khattri wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > - the 'gentoo' text in the upper left of the page should use the cool
> > red bubble letters [1]
>
> Never liked the red lettering - very dated.
I thought that Daniel was taking the red bubble
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> - the 'gentoo' text in the upper left of the page should use the cool
> red bubble letters [1]
Never liked the red lettering - very dated.
--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 05:24:06PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> The infinity design makes us look like a bunch of ricers. Kill it!
I couldn't agree more.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
pgpAeXf0OU21z.pgp
Description: PGP sig
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:09:55 + Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| - the 'gentoo' text in the upper left of the page should use the cool
| red bubble letters [1] ... or at least drop the infinity sign ...
| yeah, the infinity sign is cool, but since it is in such a 'high
| profile' l
Vapier wrote: [Mon Nov 21 2005, 08:09:55AM CST]
> - wheres the ufo guy [2] ? at least hide him in the bottom left
> corner of the page ... it'd keep with the mysterious nature of the
> fellow
> [2] http://www.gentoo.org/images/gridtest.gif
Drobbins wanted to hang on to Znurt when he left. You'
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:49:42PM +0100, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:09:55 +
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - the bar at the top which blathers on about what Gentoo has to
> > offer i could do without completely (imo, you can read the About
>
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:09:55 +
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - the bar at the top which blathers on about what Gentoo has to
> offer i could do without completely (imo, you can read the About
> page)
What about keeping it on front page only? (with the vertical size
issue fixed s
- the 'about' blurb has way too much vertical spacing == wasted
- the ad bar on the left should be thrown behind a purple bar like the
current site does ... it helps the user visually tune the space out as
crap they can safely ignore (at least it helps me)
- can we cut out the ads alogether for
28 matches
Mail list logo
