Re: [gentoo-dev] packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers

2006-09-06 Thread Mike Frysinger
lets try resending this since our shitty mail servers seemed to have eaten it On Sunday 03 September 2006 05:20, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > or the > committer be listed as a maintainer email address along with whoever is > being proxied. maybe extend metadata.xml syntax ... add a proxy dev maintaine

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers

2006-09-03 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Sunday 03 September 2006 11:20, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > triggered by bug #77751: hspell lists a non-gentoo.org address for > the maintainer email, the herd as maintainer-needed, and no other > addresses. > > Is this sort of thing now ok? No. Carsten pgpLh7ZV4WbmG.pgp Description: PGP signat

[gentoo-dev] packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers

2006-09-03 Thread Kevin F. Quinn
triggered by bug #77751: hspell lists a non-gentoo.org address for the maintainer email, the herd as maintainer-needed, and no other addresses. Is this sort of thing now ok? I don't think it's a good idea for devs to be putting stuff into the tree without taking responsibility for it. I would ex