On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:18:10 -0700,
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more
useful to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:49:40 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 15:18, Zac Medico wrote:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more
useful to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a new
IUSE_DEFAULTS ebuild variable. If people like that particular
* Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via
a new IUSE_DEFAULTS ebuild variable.
hmm, what do you do if there's a need for arch specific defaults ?
IMHO its better to have these defaults somewhere within the profile.
Maybe
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 16:28, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
hmm, what do you do if there's a need for arch specific defaults ?
not accounted for as we really havent found this to be a big deal
IMHO its better to have these defaults somewhere within the profile.
Maybe another package.use alike
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 15:18, Zac Medico wrote:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a new
IUSE_DEFAULTS ebuild variable. If people like that particular
Hi Zac,
On 8/8/06, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a new
IUSE_DEFAULTS
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Hi Zac,
On 8/8/06, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more
useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 22:57:44 +0100
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a package maintainer, I'm happy :) Is this going to cause problems
for arch teams at all?
I hope not. I've been looking forward to this for arch specific
reasons (like if package foo fails to build with the perl use
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 19:46, Jason Wever wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 22:57:44 +0100
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a package maintainer, I'm happy :) Is this going to cause problems
for arch teams at all?
I hope not. I've been looking forward to this for arch specific
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 05:49:40PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 15:18, Zac Medico wrote:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a new
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:56:01 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
huh ? i think you're thinking of per-package use.mask, not
per-package use defaults
Oh yeah good call.
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
