All,
Many packages have been masked in the tree for months - years with no
signs of fixes.
I am particularly concerned about packages with known security
vulnerabilities staying in the main tree masked. If people want to keep
using those packages, I don't want to stop them, but packages like this
On 01/07/15 06:24, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> Many packages have been masked in the tree for months - years with no
> signs of fixes.
>
> I am particularly concerned about packages with known security
> vulnerabilities staying in the main tree masked. If people want to keep
> using those pac
150106 William Hubbs wrote:
> Many packages have been masked in the tree for months - years
> with no signs of fixes. I am particularly concerned
> about packages with known security vulnerabilities
> staying in the main tree masked. If people want to keep those packages,
> I don't want to stop t
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> 150106 William Hubbs wrote:
> > Many packages have been masked in the tree for months - years
> > with no signs of fixes. I am particularly concerned
> > about packages with known security vulnerabilities
> > staying in the main tree m
150107 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
>> 150106 William Hubbs wrote:
>>> Many packages have been masked in the tree for months - years
>>> with no signs of fixes. I am particularly concerned
>>> about packages with known security vulnerabilities
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
>> 150106 William Hubbs wrote:
>> This one is perfectly safe on a single-user system : please leave it there.
>
> I'm not opposed to it staying in the tree under one of these conditi
