On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 04:55:14PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 08:49:59AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Hola all.
> [snip]
>
> under 'Deletions for Sunday May 01 2005'
> unknown:
> portage-2.0.51.20.tar.bz2 sandbox-1.2.tar.bz2
> Perhaps a major glitch here, sin
> Aside from that, kindly check the failed fetches on the list. If one
> of your ebuilds is in that list, either no valid URI could be found,
> or you doffed the SRC_URI for it (mirror:// w/out a mirror has been
> common).
The following from the list report no valid uri although they WORKFORME.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 08:49:59AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> Hola all.
[snip]
under 'Deletions for Sunday May 01 2005'
unknown:
portage-2.0.51.20.tar.bz2 sandbox-1.2.tar.bz2
Perhaps a major glitch here, since portage-2.0.51.20 is the latest version?
Also, will the script be re-run bef
On Sat, 2005-23-04 at 23:29 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:49:59 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be
> | removed from the mirrors network.
>
> I just had a random thought. Have our GLEP 19 p
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:49:59 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be
| removed from the mirrors network.
I just had a random thought. Have our GLEP 19 people thought about this
at all?
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Develop
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 12:18:30PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > A quicky report of flies that'll be ixnayed is available at
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/failure.xml
>
> Thanks for making that page! I just searched it and found two packages I
> cared about with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
> A quicky report of flies that'll be ixnayed is available at
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/failure.xml
Thanks for making that page! I just searched it and found two packages I
cared about with wrong SRC_URI's, fixed one and
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 05:54:40PM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> >Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be
> >removed from the mirrors network. Either
> >
> >A) no ebuild claims that distfile. it's orphaned on our mirrors
> >B) RESTRICT="fetch" is
Brian Harring wrote:
>Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be
>removed from the mirrors network. Either
>
>A) no ebuild claims that distfile. it's orphaned on our mirrors
>B) RESTRICT="fetch" is set for the ebuild. We don't mirror those
> files.
>C) RESTRICT="mirro
Hola all.
So mirror-dist is ready to go, infra side of it being set for a final
testing run then switching it live if things go fine after next
weekend.
Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be
removed from the mirrors network. Either
A) no ebuild claims that distfil
10 matches
Mail list logo
