Re: [gentoo-dev] [Proposal] Eclass for nodejs modules

2016-02-29 Thread Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 02/29/2016 06:24 PM, Andrew Udvare wrote: > > On 29/02/16 03:23, Geaaru wrote: > >> > >> In conclusion, it seems that is not accepted use of nodejs modules > >> ebuild inside portage. It is right? > >> > >> > > There

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Proposal] Eclass for nodejs modules

2016-02-29 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/29/2016 06:24 PM, Andrew Udvare wrote: > On 29/02/16 03:23, Geaaru wrote: >> >> In conclusion, it seems that is not accepted use of nodejs modules >> ebuild inside portage. It is right? >> >> > There used to be a CoffeeScript ebuild if you search back. I do not > remember how it worked but

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Proposal] Eclass for nodejs modules

2016-02-29 Thread Andrew Udvare
On 29/02/16 03:23, Geaaru wrote: > > In conclusion, it seems that is not accepted use of nodejs modules > ebuild inside portage. It is right? > > There used to be a CoffeeScript ebuild if you search back. I do not remember how it worked but IIRC I think it was basically just creating a fake

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Proposal] Eclass for nodejs modules

2016-02-29 Thread Geaaru
Hi Andrew, thanks for reply. My comment hereinafter. On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 02:12 -0800, Andrew Udvare wrote: > > On 2016-02-29, at 01:38, Geaaru wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I create an eclass that permit to create ebuild for nodejs modules > > without define every times

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Proposal] Eclass for nodejs modules

2016-02-29 Thread Andrew Udvare
> On 2016-02-29, at 01:38, Geaaru wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I create an eclass that permit to create ebuild for nodejs modules > without define every times ebuild phases and avoid install of > dependencies already present on system. > My mission is create a module like