Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-19 Thread Jakub Moc
19.11.2005, 5:30:35, Stephen P. Becker wrote: Testing ebuilds when keywording/marking stable is supposed to be mandatory and such stuff does not belong into changelogs. Sorry, but that's a big no. People that add/remove keywords without making note in the Changelog deserve a massive kick

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-19 Thread Jakub Moc
19.11.2005, 10:31:23, Thierry Carrez wrote: Corey Shields wrote: Before deciding on such proposals, it might be also wise to consult infra people who'll have to implement and maintain such things, IMHO. And, how exactly will be people having multiple roles handled here - still missing a clear

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Jakub Moc
19.11.2005, 0:29:24, Kurt Lieber wrote: What purpose does this serve? This would create all sorts of confusion. Right now, you can meet someone in IRC and make a reasonable assumption that their email address is irc nick@gentoo.org. This would confuse things horribly imo. What about

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Jakub Moc
19.11.2005, 0:58:29, Grant Goodyear wrote: My preference is that the subdomain chosen should succinctly reflect the role that arch testers serve. My personal preference would be to choose something like aide, helper, assistant, or something similar. (Indeed, I'd have preferred volunteer if

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Jakub Moc
19.11.2005, 1:07:40, Homer Parker wrote: On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 23:29 +, Kurt Lieber wrote: There is no technical reason why any of this is necessary and it doesn't provide any tangible benefits that I can see. If a user really wants to know someone's role within the project, they can

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Jakub Moc
19.11.2005, 1:38:03, Grant Goodyear wrote: Incidentally, the benefit is to make users who are actively helping Gentoo feel like they're part of the family. It was decided that a straight @gentoo.org address would be confusing, though, since most people associate those addresses with

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Jakub Moc
19.11.2005, 3:07:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Sure, recognise their contributions, by giving them credit in ChangeLogs. How exactly does testing stuff fit into *changelogs*, have I missed something? -- jakub pgpd4At0gxKS4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Jakub Moc
19.11.2005, 3:49:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:27:13 +0100 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | 19.11.2005, 3:07:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | Sure, recognise their contributions, by giving them credit in | ChangeLogs. | | How exactly does testing stuff fit into