25.12.2005, 4:17:05, Bret Towe wrote:
> On 12/24/05, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This isn't politics, but copyright infringement on top of a ridiculous
>> license
>> (when you want to see it as one) we had a short discussion1 about several
>> months ago.
> im sorry i fail to se
25.12.2005, 3:51:15, Brian Harring wrote:
> Jakub responded in this thread about shipping a crap license... imo,
> that's not the issue.
> The issue is that we would be knowingly violating a license (however
> horrid the license is).
> Two routes out of this- clean room reimplementation of
