Re[8]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-23 Thread Jakub Moc
23.11.2005, 11:25:58, Paul de Vrieze wrote: On Wednesday 23 November 2005 01:55, Jakub Moc wrote: emerge -e world emerge -e world emerge depclean You've missed revdep-rebuild to fix the borkage that emerge depclean produced. ;) After double rebuilding of the complete world I would

Re: Re[8]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-23 Thread Ned Ludd
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 12:06 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: BTW, I'd still like to know how I'll get nptl(only) hardened install once stage1 is gone. i386 does not have nptl, and I've done change CHOST emerge -e system emerge -e world job a couple of times and it never went smoothly. Please calm

Re: Re[8]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-23 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 12:06, Jakub Moc wrote: 23.11.2005, 11:25:58, Paul de Vrieze wrote: On Wednesday 23 November 2005 01:55, Jakub Moc wrote: emerge -e world emerge -e world emerge depclean You've missed revdep-rebuild to fix the borkage that emerge depclean produced. ;)

Re: Re[8]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-23 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 08:19:40AM -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: ha ok new rule for me. drink coffee before sending first mail of the morn. What's this supposed to imply? That you didn't intend to repeat yourself in the original mail - or that hardened will continue to ship 2.4.x stages for 2006.0+?

Re: Re[8]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-23 Thread solar
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 16:57 +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 08:19:40AM -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: ha ok new rule for me. drink coffee before sending first mail of the morn. What's this supposed to imply? That you didn't intend to repeat yourself in the original mail