# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (14 Nov 2010)
# No longer developed and replaced by sys-apps/mlocate
# Bug 338380
# Removal in 30 days
sys-apps/slocate
Hello,
thanks for your interest. This thread is not about Python 3.x in
particular, in case you wonder.
In this mail
- Typical GCC update (for comparison)
- Python 2.7 update simulation (and how it fails)
- The scenario
- What happens
- How it happens
- Conclusion
+1
I totally agree with the conclusion. I believe that choice, select
the active version of Python, should not be implied by us, but taken
by the user even if he explicitly asked for a new version to be
installed.
I've been in this situation before, and just because I wanted to try
some new cool
On Sunday 14 November 2010 09:45:04 Alex Alexander wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:10:26PM +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 11/14/10 1:00 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
I have another great idea for you. People are lazy, so
Any improvements to the text are welcome.
Regards,
Petteri
Title: Pending Removal of Java support in ia64
Author: Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org
Author: IA64 Arch Team i...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2010-11-14
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Keyword: ia64
On 11/14/10 8:36 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
The IA64 arch team does not have the resources to maintain Java support so we
agreed that support will be dropped unless more man power becomes available.
Could you also add the info to
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/staffing-needs/ ?
Moreover,
Any improvements to the text are welcome.
I think the following could be written clearer. Reading it made me have to
go off and check what week 50 was.
If there is no interest the removal of Java support well be done during week
50 of year 2010.
why not say
'If there is no interest the
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
Any improvements to the text are welcome.
I think the following could be written clearer. Reading it made me have to
go off and check what week 50 was.
52 weeks in a year, so, effectively last two weeks of the year.
# Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org (14 Nov 2010)
# Last rites: dev-tex/ha-prosper
# Old standalone ebuild, provided by dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra these days
# Removal on 14 Dec 2010
dev-tex/ha-prosper
Hi,
I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of
fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary. While I
personally think it is not useful to gentoo users, one might still want
to give the choice to build the fat binary.
-) Are there other packages that
Am 14.11.2010 17:28, schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
With Python, when you install a newer version if gets activated, leaving
your system in broken state. An update of Python always involves
running python-updater. If the user/admin has to run that anyway, why
should we take the call to eselect
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sunday 14 November 2010 09:45:04 Alex Alexander wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:10:26PM +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 11/14/10 1:00 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a
Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto:
I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of
fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary.
Oh the heck are they implemented? If they are FatELF, no they shouldn't
be used, ever, full
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-11-14 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-wireless/libeap 2010-11-08 17:42:50 alexxy
dev-python/IcePy2010-11-08 19:13:48 arfrever
Additions:
dev-tex/floatflt
On 11/15/2010 01:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto:
I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of
fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary.
Oh the heck are they implemented? If they
On 00:30 Mon 15 Nov , Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto:
I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of
fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary.
Oh the heck are they implemented? If
On 11/11/2010 05:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to begin stabilizing packages on MIPS. I've gotten acks from
Redhatter, leio, and r0bertz, and Kumba doesn't really care.
What's the best method to go about doing this? Stabilize the system
packages, then remove ~mips from ACCEPT_KEYWORDS
On 11/14/2010 05:41 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
On 00:30 Mon 15 Nov , Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto:
I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of
fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the
18 matches
Mail list logo
