Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
William Hubbs wrote:
As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as well
reinstall anyway. That is usually the advice given on -user. After a year
without updating, it is
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, William Hubbs wrote:
Please discuss. Did I leave out any steps? Are there any points I
have left out besides the time window between steps 2 and 3? Should
there be a time window before removing baselayout-1? What about
between steps 1 and 2? What do you consider to be a
On 07/01/11 07:56, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
William Hubbs wrote:
As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as well
reinstall anyway. That is usually the advice given on -user. After a year
without
В Чтв, 30/06/2011 в 19:27 +, Sebastian Pipping (sping) пишет:
Log:
net-misc/aria2: Bump to 1.12.0, looks trivial
EAPI=2
inherit bash-completion
...
pkg_setup() {
if use scripts use !xmlrpc use !metalink; then
ewarn Please also enable the 'xmlrpc' USE flag
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:03:41 +0400
Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote:
pkg_setup() {
if use scripts use !xmlrpc use !metalink; then
This really calls for REQUIRED_USE from EAPI=4.
REQUIRED_USE=scripts? ( ^^ ( xmlrpc metalink ) )
That's not the same condition as the one in the
Nirbheek Chauhan posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:26:50 +0530 as excerpted:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
William Hubbs wrote:
As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as
well reinstall anyway. That is usually the advice given on
On 07/01/11 11:25, Duncan wrote:
Nirbheek Chauhan posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:26:50 +0530 as excerpted:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
William Hubbs wrote:
As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as
well reinstall anyway. That
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (1 Jul 2011)
# Dead upstream, no updates since 2002. Does not build
# against glibc-2.14 ( bug #371157 ). Masked for removal
# in 30 days
app-arch/upm
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (1 Jul 2011)
# Does not build against gcc-4.5. Bug #323061
# Masked for removal in 30 days
net-libs/clinkcc
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (1 Jul 2011)
# The whole suite seems abandoned.
# QA and compilation problems ( bug #236286 ).
# Has been replaced by sys-apps/pcmciautils
# Masked for removal in 30 days
sys-apps/pcmcia-cs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (1 Jul 2011)
# Does not respect LDFLAGS (bug #333505).
# The core functionality has been replaced by
# app-emulation/qemu
# Masked for removal in 30 days
app-emulation/gdb-armulator
- --
Regards,
Markos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (1 Jul 2011)
# Does not build against gcc-4.5. Bug #320337.
# Masked for removal in 30 days
app-emulation/pearpc
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (1 Jul 2011)
# Does not build against gcc-4.5. Bug #319679
# Masked for removal in 30 days
app-crypt/steghid
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP
Patrick Lauer posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:45:16 +0200 as excerpted:
So keeping an up and running machine even with a reinstall isn't a
problem, certainly no more of one than fighting with broken installs,
because everything has changed out from under the existing one.
It's not as easy as
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 08:38:38AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, William Hubbs wrote:
Please discuss. Did I leave out any steps? Are there any points I
have left out besides the time window between steps 2 and 3? Should
there be a time window before removing
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, William Hubbs wrote:
We have a policy on this, see
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091109-summary.txt:
| Upgrade path for old systems
|
| Vote (unanimous): The ebuild tree must provide an upgrade path to
| a stable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (1 Jul 2011)
# Dead upstream. Does not build against
# x11-libs/gktsourceview-2.10. Bug #314779
# Masked for removal in 30 days
app-text/notecase
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key
В Птн, 01/07/2011 в 09:09 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:03:41 +0400
Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote:
pkg_setup() {
if use scripts use !xmlrpc use !metalink; then
This really calls for REQUIRED_USE from EAPI=4.
REQUIRED_USE=scripts? ( ^^ ( xmlrpc
On 11:26 Fri 01 Jul , Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Except for the fact that while you upgrade, you still have a usable
system. Reinstallation means a massive time-sink during which your
machine is completely unusable. This is not an option for a lot of
people.
If -user is regularly giving
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:08:53AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 11:26 Fri 01 Jul , Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Except for the fact that while you upgrade, you still have a usable
system. Reinstallation means a massive time-sink during which your
machine is completely unusable. This is
All,
this is a followup thread to the one about openrc being mandatory on all
gentoo systems.
I started a new thread, because I want to figure out which
functions located in /etc/init.d/functions.sh need to be available
regardless of the init system in use.
So far, I'm thinking this is the
William Hubbs wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:08:53AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 11:26 Fri 01 Jul , Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Except for the fact that while you upgrade, you still have a usable
system. Reinstallation means a massive time-sink during which your
machine is
On 07/01/2011 10:03 AM, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Чтв, 30/06/2011 в 19:27 +, Sebastian Pipping (sping) пишет:
Log:
net-misc/aria2: Bump to 1.12.0, looks trivial
EAPI=2
inherit bash-completion
...
pkg_setup() {
if use scripts use !xmlrpc use !metalink; then
ewarn
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:44, William Hubbs wrote:
this is a followup thread to the one about openrc being mandatory on all
gentoo systems.
I started a new thread, because I want to figure out which
functions located in /etc/init.d/functions.sh need to be available
regardless of the init
On 07/01/11 21:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
[SNIP]
If we use EAPI 4 in that ebuild we cannot make it stable anytime soon,
correct?
As far as I'm aware we have a stable portage with EAPI 4 in the tree for
a few weeks now, so you can actively use it everywhere.
--
Patrick Lauer
Duncan posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:26:58 + as excerpted:
Patrick Lauer posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:45:16 +0200 as excerpted:
[Keeping an up and running system during a reinstall is] not as easy
as it could be.
Can't disagree there. =:^)
... And upon further thought, can't disagree
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
You're very correct about portage getting confused if the existing
packages are outdated, since the tarball would be dropping in untracked
files. At least in the past, portage wouldn't unmerge glibc or the like,
but it
Rich Freeman posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:50:28 -0400 as excerpted:
I wonder if there is a way to get around keeping cruft in the tree for
the sake of those who don't update often.
Something that comes to mind is having a binpkg repository for
everything in system - essentially a binpkg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01-07-2011 19:33, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 07/01/11 21:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
[SNIP]
If we use EAPI 4 in that ebuild we cannot make it stable anytime soon,
correct?
As far as I'm aware we have a stable portage with EAPI 4 in the tree
29 matches
Mail list logo
