[gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass

2011-07-22 Thread Maxim Koltsov
Hi devs, I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32 packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to commit it to the tree. Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g. leechcraft-plugins) to simplify managing leechcraft ebuilds. And the

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: leechcraft.eclass

2011-07-22 Thread Maxim Koltsov
Sorry, forgot the eclass. Attaching it here... P.S. Email of author: 0xd34df...@gmail.com leechcraft.eclass Description: Binary data

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass

2011-07-22 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov: Hi devs, I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32 packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to commit it to the tree. Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass

2011-07-22 Thread Alex Alexander
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:21, Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov: Hi devs, I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32 packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to commit it to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass

2011-07-22 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Maxim Koltsov schrieb: Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g. leechcraft-plugins) to simplify managing leechcraft ebuilds. And the last question: is it good to add versions for all ebuilds too? I don't think there is a need for a new category. But I do think it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass

2011-07-22 Thread Rich Freeman
2011/7/22 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org: But I do think it is good to have live ebuilds in portage, especially for fast moving applications. I think they can be useful for any application as long as they're maintained. I can see the value of the QA policy that they must be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dragonheart retirement

2011-07-22 Thread Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Due dragonheart retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-python/pyspf dev-python/python-lzo Python team will take these two. Best regards, -- Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) Gentoo Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: leechcraft.eclass

2011-07-22 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:57:08 +0400 Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote: Sorry, forgot the eclass. Attaching it here... P.S. Email of author: 0xd34df...@gmail.com Then you should CC him (like I did now). # Original author: 0xd34df00d 0xd34df...@gmail.com and #

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass

2011-07-22 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Alex Alexander schrieb am 22.07.11 um 13:30 Uhr: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:21, Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov: Hi devs, I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32 packages and uses it's

[gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-22 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Hello fellow devs, some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for some reason :-) One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on cvs-git conversion and keep our experimental conversion

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-22 Thread Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@gentoo.org: Hello fellow devs, some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for some reason :-) One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-22 Thread Arun Raghavan
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@gentoo.org: Hello fellow devs, some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for some reason :-) One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on