On 08/02/2011 11:29 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:18:17 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think I prefer the second option (copying from Exherbo). A better
integration with the package manager than USE flags should result
in a better user experience.
Are you
On 07/30/2011 01:42 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi everyone,
We've found that portage's unpack behavior is inconsistent for non-tar
files compressed with gz|Z|z|bz2|bz|lzma|xz extensions [1]. Currently,
it emulates tools like gunzip and bunzip2, unpacking them to the
directory of the source file.
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:29:29 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 06:39:18PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:36:12 -0400
Jonathan Callen a...@gentoo.org wrote:
That statement needs one more qualification: and doesn't use
portage.
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:27:23 +0200
Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) klond...@gentoo.org wrote:
El 03/08/11 06:57, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:13:19AM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo
Riera (klondike) wrote:
Come on they can't be serious... this won't work
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:27:23 +0200
Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) klond...@gentoo.org wrote:
El 03/08/11 06:57, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:13:19AM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo
Hello!
Version in Gentoo: 2.32.52
Version upstream: 2.40.63
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353282
The bug is old enough to justify a takeover to me, provided you act with
resonable care.
Sebastian
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:20:18 +0200
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello!
Version in Gentoo: 2.32.52
Version upstream: 2.40.63
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353282
The bug is old enough to justify a takeover to me, provided you act
with resonable care.
+1
I'm
On 08/03/2011 07:37 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
I'm more or less alone in the ml herd (maintainer) and I don't use
unison :(
While you mention the herd: how come this is herd=ml?
Best,
Sebastian
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:38:10 +0200
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/03/2011 07:37 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
I'm more or less alone in the ml herd (maintainer) and I don't use
unison :(
While you mention the herd: how come this is herd=ml?
because it's written in ocaml
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 12:34:21PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:29:29 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not a massive change to vdb behaviour either; file
collisions aren't supposed to occur, as such ownership of the file is
basically guranteed
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:26:56 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Aka, ebuild's should be written to assume the files they install get
wiped; there is *zero* mention of mtime, nor could any ebuild rely on
it and be compliant.
But as it's a FEATURE, they can't assume that at all.
So
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:28:51PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:26:56 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Aka, ebuild's should be written to assume the files they install get
wiped; there is *zero* mention of mtime, nor could any ebuild rely on
it and be
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:27:27 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Since running separate /usr without mounting it from initramfs on top
of / before init is and has been broken with udev for a long time
now[1][2][3]
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364235
[2]
# Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org) (04 Aug 2011)
# libots is only used by Compaq's C compiler, which was tree
# cleaned years ago. Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-libs/libots
14 matches
Mail list logo
