On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:06:03 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:14:31AM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote
We're imposing our deep integration because it's the only way to
make a compelling platform that just works, forcing users to tell
the computer
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:49:19 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:00:23 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Then please continue with udev in package.mask and kindly stop
trying to impose your workflow on the rest of the world.
Sorry for being completely OT now, will be the only mail on this from my
side...
On Thursday, 13. October 2011 18:05:47 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:14:31 -0400
Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:49 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 12
On 15.10.2011 10:42, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
in what way will exherbo deal wih this mess? Are there any plans?
We don't support /usr on a separate partition. People can, of course, do
that and I'll point them to dracut for creating an initramfs.
Or they can do whatever works for them.
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Wulf C. Krueger w...@mailstation.de wrote:
On 15.10.2011 10:42, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
in what way will exherbo deal wih this mess? Are there any plans?
We don't support /usr on a separate partition. People can, of course, do
that and I'll point them to
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Wulf C. Krueger w...@mailstation.de wrote:
On 15.10.2011 10:42, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
in what way will exherbo deal wih this mess? Are there any plans?
We don't support /usr
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:54, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
That would be an ok approach from my perspective: We could just change
line 14 of python.eclass and let package maintainers report breakage as
they increment EAPI. I am confident that nothing EAPI = 3 would break.
Is anyone
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/14/2011 09:11 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 10/14/11 5:38 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
I believe op's point is that there is no one to escalate the problem
to; certainly the council members are not going to do the work
On 10/14/2011 04:59 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:01:50 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Title: Upgrade to libpng15
Author: Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2011-10-14
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
On 10/14/2011 11:48 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El vie, 14-10-2011 a las 01:01 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
small news item for stable users. lets keep it simple...
Is early rebuilding of gdk-pixbuf still needed now that fixed version
will be stabilized before libpng15?
The blockers that
On Saturday 15 October 2011 03:29:54 Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:06:03 -0400 Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:14:31AM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote
We're imposing our deep integration because it's the only way to
make a compelling platform that just works, forcing
El sáb, 15-10-2011 a las 19:35 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 10/14/2011 11:48 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El vie, 14-10-2011 a las 01:01 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
small news item for stable users. lets keep it simple...
Is early rebuilding of gdk-pixbuf still needed now that
On Saturday, October 15, 2011 09:29:54 AM Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:06:03 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:14:31AM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote
We're imposing our deep integration because it's the only way to
make a compelling
On 10/15/11 2:42 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:54, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
That would be an ok approach from my perspective: We could just change
line 14 of python.eclass and let package maintainers report breakage as
they increment EAPI. I am confident
On 10/16/2011 12:00 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 10/15/11 2:42 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:54, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
That would be an ok approach from my perspective: We could just change
line 14 of python.eclass and let package maintainers report
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:17:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ocne you have identified the broken files, you can either delete them,
^
edit them in place and replace png14 with png15, or re-emerge the packages
Otherwise good.
--
fonts, gcc-porting, it
On 10/16/2011 12:43 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:17:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ocne you have identified the broken files, you can either delete them,
^
edit them in place and replace png14 with png15, or re-emerge the packages
Otherwise good.
On 10/15/2011 01:57 AM, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
On 15.10.2011 10:42, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
in what way will exherbo deal wih this mess? Are there any plans?
We don't support /usr on a separate partition. People can, of course, do
that and I'll point them to dracut for creating an
18 matches
Mail list logo
