On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus11/10/23 12:00:55
Modified: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild
Log:
Bump to eapi4 and punt static libs.
Time to revert this commit as I don't see anything in the ebuild that
disables building the
On 10/23/2011 03:03 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus11/10/23 12:03:00
Modified: yajl-2.0.2.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Make static libs optional
Requires reverting too, as it's still building the static archives,
effectively hiding the problem instead of
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus 11/10/23 12:00:55
Modified: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild
Log:
Bump to eapi4 and punt static libs.
Time to revert
On 10/23/2011 04:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus11/10/23 12:00:55
Modified: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild
Log:
Bump to
On Sonntag 23 Oktober 2011 15:34:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree.
Do you have any idea how much time me, and aballier spent to make
cdparanoia's build system as clean as
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree.
How is this a quality issue? Why do we have a static-libs USE flag is
packages can't use
2011/10/23 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org:
On 10/23/2011 04:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus 11/10/23 12:00:55
Modified:
On 10/23/2011 04:57 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree.
How is this a quality issue? Why do we
On 10/23/2011 05:01 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
2011/10/23 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org:
On 10/23/2011 04:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
scarabeus
Andreas K. Huettel posted on Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:50:04 +0200 as excerpted:
I'd like to get my standards up to speed, so may I respectfully ask-
what is,
apart from link time, the Gentoo-user-visible difference between *
removing the .a files in the ebuild * and not building them in the first
Looks like the thread I started about moving more hardened features to
default
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ef3dbd4ba400a5936cd5b7546b86d875.xml
got a lot of positive feedback. Kernel hardening features are more
problematic, but hardening the toolchain seems to be within reach.
I'd
---
scons-utils.eclass | 33 +
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scons-utils.eclass b/scons-utils.eclass
index a87b6e6..16fda7a 100644
--- a/scons-utils.eclass
+++ b/scons-utils.eclass
@@ -14,11 +14,21 @@
# @CODE
# inherit
On 10/23/2011 02:00 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Looks like the thread I started about moving more hardened features to
default
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ef3dbd4ba400a5936cd5b7546b86d875.xml
got a lot of positive feedback. Kernel hardening features are more
problematic, but
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
Where would the hardened profiles fit in this? This requires some
thought. Right now hardened means three choices: 1) hardened
toolchain, 2) hardened-sources kernel, 3) hardened profile. Some
packages are masked
On 10/23/2011 03:20 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Where would the hardened profiles fit in this? This requires some
thought. Right now hardened means three choices: 1) hardened
toolchain, 2) hardened-sources
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2011-10-23 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
kde-misc/kcm_gtk2011-10-17 20:12:46 dilfridge
dev-games/cel 2011-10-19 16:10:29 ssuominen
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:20:37PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
---
scons-utils.eclass | 33 +
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
...
+# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: myesconsargs
+# @DEFAULT_UNSET
+# @DESCRIPTION:
+# List of package-specific options to
17 matches
Mail list logo
