On 20 July 2012 15:33, Ralph Sennhauser s...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:37:32 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
I got a few more suggestions on IRC, and I have updated the eclass
accordingly. Please check the attached new version, also available at
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:29:44 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
# ones. This function is normally used internally in this eclass,
not by # l10n.eclass consumers.
l10n_get_locales() {
I'd mark this function @INTERNAL then, at least until someone can
presents a use case.
If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2012 08:44 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il 22/07/2012 14:38, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto:
It would seem to me that we could get all these QA warning out of the
way very quickly by adding -frecord-gcc-switches to the *FLAGS in the
As explained at:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284822
There are multiple issues with sys-apps/man that could be solved
switching to sys-apps/man-db instead, the problem is that the process
looks to be blocked by:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289884
After checking that bug
Il 23/07/2012 10:30, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto:
Those are two very valid reasons why we can't add these to the profiles,
but do you have any suggestions on how we can get more than just
yourself running this QA?
Add it to the dev profile (I think we have one?) via bashrc, then we
It has security bugs opened for a long time:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408507
Also, current version fails to build, and the same occurs while trying
to bump to the latest version:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421861
Help with this is needed, otherwise we will probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2012 01:44 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il 23/07/2012 10:30, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto:
Those are two very valid reasons why we can't add these to the profiles,
but do you have any suggestions on how we can get more than just
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Help is needed
I'd actually just run bird instead.
fails to build: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421861
Did anyone report it upstream?
//Peter
pgp7wB8cqKxOl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Il 23/07/2012 14:10, Peter Stuge ha scritto:
Did anyone report it upstream?
Not me ... because I wouldn't know which one to care about. The problem
with upstream is that you have what they call master that is not really
stable, then what they call 'Release Engineering' that looks like a
kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone have
any comments about it?
The idea is to show this news item on all Gentoo systems. Is that even
possible / desirable?
I've talked with both the PR and Docs team before about this
Il 23/07/2012 17:07, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto ha scritto:
from /etc to /etc/postfix.
Are you really sure? I don't think Portage looks for it there ... ;)
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
snip
Starting with catalyst 2.0.10, make.conf and make.profile will be
moved from /etc to /etc/postfix. Releng build boxes will be updated to
s/postfix/portage/
snip
--
Doug Goldstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 00:19, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il 23/07/2012 17:07, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto ha scritto:
from /etc to /etc/postfix.
Are you really sure? I don't think Portage looks for it there ...
;)
Thanks Diego for catching the typo.
It's
On 07/23/2012 07:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hi.
I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone have
any comments about it?
The idea is to show this news item on all Gentoo systems. Is that even
possible / desirable?
I've talked with both the PR and Docs team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2012 08:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hi.
I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone have
any comments about it?
The idea is to show this news item on all Gentoo systems. Is that even
possible /
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone have
any comments about it?
What action if any do you want Gentoo users to take. If I read that
news item the first question I'd have is
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 20:28 -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
A lot of things, app-portage/ufed for example, don't support this yet...
ufed is on the endanged species list, along with a few other app-portage
utilities. It hasn't been developed or maintained for some time now. If
it is to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 01:33, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone
have any comments about it?
What action if any
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is just a heads-up for Gentoo users that got used to find
make.conf and make.profile under /etc in stages, that these files will
stop being there and will instead be under /etc/portage. So we are
On Jul 23, 2012 9:43 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 20:28 -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
A lot of things, app-portage/ufed for example, don't support this yet...
ufed is on the endanged species list, along with a few other app-portage
utilities. It
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 22:22 -0400, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote:
On Jul 23, 2012 9:43 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 20:28 -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
A lot of things, app-portage/ufed for example, don't support this
yet...
ufed is on
Il 23/07/2012 20:34, Ben de Groot ha scritto:
I'm assuming this is true for make.globals as well? That should be added
then. And as others have said, there really need to be instructions
what if anything should be done about current installations.
I actually thought make.globals was going to
22 matches
Mail list logo
