On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:53:29 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent
earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well, initial :P) eclasses
for review.
They are designed as 'mostly' drop-in python-distutils-ng replacement.
This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32
(https://bugs.gentoo.org/423815), and upstream said they *won't*
support x32
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/v8-users/c-_URSZqTq8/7wHl095t2CMJ).
Note that with v8 it's not just about getting v8 itself to compile, but
also making it
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32
(https://bugs.gentoo.org/423815), and upstream said they *won't*
support x32
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/v8-users/c-_URSZqTq8/7wHl095t2CMJ).
Note
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is it possible to disable the JIT engine?
Well, if you're going to wholesale disable functionality, how about
client-side rendering? It drives me nuts as it is REALLY SLOW!!!
That is, unless the graphics hardware is local
[ eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass ]-8-
--- PORTAGE/eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass
+++ OVERLAY/eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass
@@ -117,6 +117,42 @@
return 0
}
+# @FUNCTION: prepend-ldpath
+# @USAGE: path
+# @DESCRIPTION:
+# Place the specified ldpath into LDFLAGS before any options which
On 5 October 2012 22:28, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32
(https://bugs.gentoo.org/423815), and upstream said they *won't*
support x32
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/v8-users/c-_URSZqTq8/7wHl095t2CMJ).
Note that with
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 09:36 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 05:52 +, Alec Warner escribió:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 22-09-2012 a las 13:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
On Friday 21 September 2012 15:08:20
