[gentoo-dev] Ohloh Organizations - Gentoo Linux

2012-11-15 Thread Justin
Hi, does anybody like to setup an Organization[1] profile @ ohloh for Gentoo? justin [1] https://www.ohloh.net/orgs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Thomas Sachau
Ben de Groot schrieb: On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Alexis Ballier schrieb: - considering gentoo generally uses e-prefixed names (econf, emake, etc.) maybe its wiser to name the variables E17_* instead of only E_*, or ENLIGHTENMENT_*, so that it makes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 15/11/2012 11:45, Thomas Sachau wrote: ok, so what about ENLIGHTENMENT_MODULES as USE_EXPANDED var? LGTM -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Duncan
Thomas Sachau posted on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:45:16 +0100 as excerpted: Ben de Groot schrieb: On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Alexis Ballier schrieb: - considering gentoo generally uses e-prefixed names (econf, emake, etc.) maybe its wiser to name the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Thomas Sachau posted on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:45:16 +0100 as excerpted: Ben de Groot schrieb: On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Alexis Ballier schrieb: - considering gentoo generally uses

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 15/11/12 03:43 PM, Duncan wrote: Thomas Sachau posted on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:45:16 +0100 as excerpted: Ben de Groot schrieb: On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Alexis Ballier schrieb: - considering gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Re: Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Duncan
Ian Stakenvicius posted on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:08:55 -0500 as excerpted: Portage doesn't do this (for me at least, 2.1.11.31 and previous); it shows [USE_EXPAND]=possible1 possible2 possible3 ...; no [use_expand_] prefixed on -v output .. It was doing that for awhile. But then it switched to

Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing dev-libs/icu c++11 bustage, testers wanted

2012-11-15 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 11/14/12 9:09 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 14/11/2012 21:02, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: My _limited_ testing seems to indicate it's working. But if you people can just do your tests, that would be most welcome. Please report back either success or failure. What kind of testing are you

Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing dev-libs/icu c++11 bustage, testers wanted

2012-11-15 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 15/11/2012 21:13, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: -r1 disables C++11 completely, while -r2 just allows reverse dependencies of icu not to support C++11, while possibly making icu use C++11 features internally (I was asked by an upstream icu developer to test that; if this still causes problems, we