On 17 December 2012 18:55, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/12/17 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org:
Please don't. For most users this is a waste of resources.
On first look it seems like waste of resources.
On second hand it makes stuff easy wrt bugreports provided by users.
On 23 December 2012 09:57, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 22-12-2012 a las 13:53 -0800, Zac Medico escribió:
On 12/22/2012 01:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 22 December 2012 09:26, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello
After seeing:
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 12:20 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
But like I said, elog messages are already saved in
/var/log/portage/elog/$cat/$pf so people can
read these. Isn't this the same with what you suggest?
Is that by default? And when was that default added?
I certainly do not have
On 23 December 2012 13:58, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 12:20 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
But like I said, elog messages are already saved in
/var/log/portage/elog/$cat/$pf so people can
read these. Isn't this the same with what you suggest?
Is
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 08:58 -0500, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 12:20 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
But like I said, elog messages are already saved in
/var/log/portage/elog/$cat/$pf so people can
read these. Isn't this the same with what you suggest?
Is that by
torrents.gentoo.org has been down for a few months now, and there have
been very few comments about it. Up until a few years ago, it was still
quite useful, but I believe that we have sufficient bandwidth and
mirror-coverage around the world that it's become a moot point.
If you have any
On 12/23/2012 08:35 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 08:58 -0500, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 12:20 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
But like I said, elog messages are already saved in
/var/log/portage/elog/$cat/$pf so people can
read these. Isn't this the same
El dom, 23-12-2012 a las 13:36 -0800, Zac Medico escribió:
On 12/23/2012 08:35 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 08:58 -0500, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 12:20 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
But like I said, elog messages are already saved in
On 23/12/2012 23:54, Pacho Ramos wrote:
The idea would be to make it to be only shown at first message and,
later, rely on people reading /usr/share/doc/e4rat-xxx/CONFIGURATION
file if they want to remember that tip
So you want in the main documentation a request to read the package
El lun, 24-12-2012 a las 00:17 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
On 23/12/2012 23:54, Pacho Ramos wrote:
The idea would be to make it to be only shown at first message and,
later, rely on people reading /usr/share/doc/e4rat-xxx/CONFIGURATION
file if they want to remember that tip
So
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-12-23 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
media-sound/leechcraft-muziczombie 2012-12-18 17:31:53 maksbotan
media-sound/leechcraft-muziczombie 2012-12-18 18:05:32 maksbotan
On 20.12.2012 19:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The tree is a database. It belongs in /var/db/.
I don't see /var/db in the latest release of the Filesystem Hierarchy
Standard:
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEVARHIERARCHY
I would prefer something that blends with FHS.
Best,
On 20.12.2012 18:27, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Now I wonder: After removal of e.g. the Portage tree from a system, it
is generally not possible to restore it. (It can be refetched, but not
to its previous state.)
Same is true for distfiles, at least to some degree. They may have
vanished
13 matches
Mail list logo
