On 14/02/13 09:26, Michael Weber wrote:
non-multilib/x86 installs to /lib, multilib is linked to /lib.
So please, stop using dramatizing this and use it as alibi for your
otherwise justified plans.
There is no guarantee multilib is linked to /lib whatsoever. Where did
you get that idea?
On Thursday 14 February 2013 08:53:45 Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 14.02.2013 08:26, schrieb Michael Weber:
On 02/14/2013 06:09 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
I need two things:
1. Users volunteering some time to keep this running
2. Agreement on a place to host tarballs no longer hosted
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Or N^4 people downloading ebuilds which serve no purpose whatever. That
stacks faster than you think.
That seems more like an argument for not having non-free (as in beer)
proprietary software in the tree at all.
I have
On Thursday 14 February 2013 13:09:15 Ben de Groot wrote:
Okay, let's do this. Since the users don't seem to be able to organize
themselves, I have taken the initiative to set this up. Currently
there is the graveyard overlay on github, and I will be opening the
required bug reports to get
On 14 February 2013 20:25, George Shapovalov geo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Um, what about the sunset overlay? IIRC, it was used/intended primarily for
this purpose. Is it still alive? (haven't heard it mentioned in a while and
layman seems to list onyl sunrise)
You probably mean kde-sunset, which
On Thursday 14 February 2013 21:03:55 Ben de Groot wrote:
On 14 February 2013 20:25, George Shapovalov geo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Um, what about the sunset overlay? IIRC, it was used/intended primarily
for
this purpose. Is it still alive? (haven't heard it mentioned in a while
and
layman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/02/13 10:33 AM, George Shapovalov wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2013 21:03:55 Ben de Groot wrote:
On 14 February 2013 20:25, George Shapovalov geo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Um, what about the sunset overlay? IIRC, it was used/intended
On 14 February 2013 15:57, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/02/13 10:33 AM, George Shapovalov wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2013 21:03:55 Ben de Groot wrote:
On 14 February 2013 20:25, George Shapovalov geo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Am 14.02.2013 17:30, schrieb Markos Chandras:
On 14 February 2013 15:57, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14/02/13 10:33 AM, George Shapovalov wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2013 21:03:55 Ben de Groot wrote:
On 14 February 2013 20:25, George Shapovalov geo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Um,
On 14 February 2013 16:37, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 14.02.2013 17:30, schrieb Markos Chandras:
On 14 February 2013 15:57, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14/02/13 10:33 AM, George Shapovalov wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2013 21:03:55 Ben de Groot wrote:
On
Hi,
I added the bug queries to http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ based by year of last
being touched.
Take look, try to close the oldest ones/invalid ones and so on.
I think it is lame we have bugs last touched in 2k5 :-P
Cheers
Tom
On 14 February 2013 18:19, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I added the bug queries to http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ based by year of last
being touched.
Take look, try to close the oldest ones/invalid ones and so on.
I think it is lame we have bugs last touched in 2k5 :-P
On Thursday 14 February 2013 19:19:52 Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
I added the bug queries to http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ based by year of
last being touched.
Take look, try to close the oldest ones/invalid ones and so on.
I think it is lame we have bugs last touched in 2k5
Probably we don't
Dne Čt 14. února 2013 18:34:10, Markos Chandras napsal(a):
Why not 2011 and 2012 as well?
Feel free to add more, its on qa-scripts git repository.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/14/2013 04:31 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
Hi guys and girls,
We hereby announce the formation of the Graveyard project [1]. It aims
to provide users with an overlay for packages removed from portage.
Users are expressly invited to partake in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/02/13 04:55 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 02/14/2013 04:31 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
Hi guys and girls,
We hereby announce the formation of the Graveyard project [1]. It
aims to provide users with an overlay for packages removed
On 14 February 2013 16:55, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.orgwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/14/2013 04:31 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
Hi guys and girls,
We hereby announce the formation of the Graveyard project [1]. It aims
to provide users with an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/13/2013 08:08 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Rick Zero_Chaos Farina schrieb:
atmel-firmware ipw2100-firmware ipw2200-firmware b43-firmware
b43legacy-firmware rtl8192su-firmware zd1201-firmware
zd1211-firmware
None of these are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/13/2013 08:39 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Rick Zero_Chaos Farina schrieb:
Having 300 -firmware packages is silly.
I can't help but noticing that some of the recently introduced iwlwifi
firmware packages came from Chromium OS.
On 15/02/13 00:27, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Remove firmware from users systems with no upgrade path and then ask
users to file a bug? That's pretty awesome, how can those people file a
You have very broken definition of removing/breaking users systems.
Masking is not breaking. The
Am 14.02.2013 22:55, schrieb Rick Zero_Chaos Farina:
On 02/14/2013 04:31 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
Hi guys and girls,
We hereby announce the formation of the Graveyard project [1]. It aims
to provide users with an overlay for packages removed from portage.
Users are expressly invited to
On 14/02/2013 23:47, Florian Philipp wrote:
Why is the overlay bad for anyone? No dev is forced to contribute to it
and no user has to activate it. There are dozens of overlays out there
which are not meant to be activated unless you know what you are doing.
I don't see how this can affect
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
The presence of dozens of overlays _is_ hurting triaging and other
issues. Things like proaudio overlay should die in a fire, and stop
bothering us to begin with.
How? We don't support overlays in the main
On 15/02/2013 01:15, Rich Freeman wrote:
How? We don't support overlays in the main tree. I could see a
package maintainer being nice if pinged by an overlay maintainer and
delaying some change for a short time to let an overlay be updated,
but issues that impact overlays should not be
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
The problem is when you have to triple-check that the user hasn't
enabled some random fucked up overlay and you have to guess whether that
might be the cause of the problem. Yes it happens, not so rarely.
Ah, I
On 15/02/2013 02:18, Rich Freeman wrote:
Ah, I always thought of overlays as places where apps tend to reside,
but of course you could have glibc in there for all we know... Good
point...
Welcome to the life of your average Gentoo ebuild maintainer.
I'd think that this would be less of an
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Ah, I always thought of overlays as places where apps tend to reside,
but of course you could have glibc in there for all we know... Good
point...
Welcome to the life of your average Gentoo ebuild maintainer.
Stop complaining (and with foul language! come on,
On 15/02/2013 02:56, Peter Stuge wrote:
Stop complaining (and with foul language! come on, you sound like
an idiot, which seems unneccessary) and let's think about solutions.
Your laziness makes you sound like an idiot too, thank you very much.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Stop complaining (and with foul language! come on, you sound like
an idiot, which seems unneccessary) and let's think about solutions.
Your laziness makes you sound like an idiot too, thank you very much.
Send me constructive criticism in an email and I'll of
29 matches
Mail list logo
