On 06/16/2013 11:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due ramereth lack of time:
sys-block/megacli
As a very unhappy owner of hardware that uses it, I'll take it.
Cheers,
Kacper
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 17/06/2013 06:55, Mike Frysinger wrote:
tar -xJf ./$i
why doesn't the bzip2 detect as bzip2 ?
Capital J is XZ not bzip2.. still, it makes me think it needs a newer
version of file to recognize it.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
On Monday 17 June 2013 01:42:15 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 02 June 2013 13:38:04 Steven J. Long wrote:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 11:03:20PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
+# is not specified, the var will be unset.
+evar_push_set() {
+ local var=$1
+ evar_push ${var}
+ case $#
On Monday 17 June 2013 03:15:53 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 17/06/2013 06:55, Mike Frysinger wrote:
tar -xJf ./$i
why doesn't the bzip2 detect as bzip2 ?
Capital J is XZ not bzip2.. still, it makes me think it needs a newer
version of file to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/17/2013 12:08 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 17 June 2013 03:15:53 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 17/06/2013 06:55, Mike Frysinger wrote:
tar -xJf ./$i
why doesn't the bzip2 detect as bzip2 ?
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 01:46:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
here's v2
These changes look good to me, and quite useful, thanks for doing this
work.
greg k-h
El lun, 17-06-2013 a las 01:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
[...]
ELT-PATCHES is only used by elibtoolize which means it requires an explicit
call to patch things
you're basically talking about the same type of problem that
https://bugs.gentoo.org/220040 tried to address. maybe we
On 06/15/13 19:02, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:56:00 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we find that all known implementations of PMS/EAPI 4 have
implemented a certain behavior,
On 17/06/2013 17:54, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
I make all my files with tar cJf
zero@ozzie ~ % file /usr/portage/distfiles/gr-osmosdr-0.0.2.tar.xz
/usr/portage/distfiles/gr-osmosdr-0.0.2.tar.xz: XZ compressed data
cJ with _current_ tar will generate XZ
cJ with _past_ tar could generate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/17/2013 04:19 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 17/06/2013 17:54, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
I make all my files with tar cJf
zero@ozzie ~ % file /usr/portage/distfiles/gr-osmosdr-0.0.2.tar.xz
On 06/16/13 11:49, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs:
app-arch/tarsync
* app-arch/tarsync
Available versions: (~)0.2.1 (~)0.2.1-r1
Homepage:http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/tarsync/
Description: Delta
On 6/17/2013 4:10 PM, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/15/13 19:02, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:56:00 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we find that all known implementations of
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 16:37 -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 06/17/2013 04:19 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 17/06/2013 17:54, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
I make all my files with tar cJf
zero@ozzie ~ % file /usr/portage/distfiles/gr-osmosdr-0.0.2.tar.xz
The GLOBAL_CONFIG_PATH constants and DEPCACHE_PATH constants should be
relative to the installation prefix of portage itself, not the installation
prefix of packages it is installing.
---
pym/_emerge/actions.py |6 ---
pym/portage/_sets/__init__.py
This adds support for picking up the EPREFIX config setting from the EPREFIX
environment variable. An emerge --prefix option is added to specify it,
analogous to --root and --config-root options.
---
pym/_emerge/actions.py |3 ++-
pym/_emerge/main.py |7
Hi Ruud,
On 17-06-2013 09:21:41 +0200, Ruud Koolen wrote:
This patch series adds support for using a portage installed in one prefix
to build packages with a different prefix.
Thanks so much for your work. I hope to have a look at this soon, and
merge this. From your work I assume your
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, at 01:00, Ruud Koolen thusly quipped:
I also didn't test whether these patches work on the prefix-portage branch. I
don't really know much far prefix-portage diverges from mainline portage, so I
don't know whether I should expect it to just work.
Prefix portage is
17 matches
Mail list logo
