-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I realise that by Gentoo is and will remain Free Software[0], what
is meant is the distribution and the source code. However, I think it
would be a bad example to use proprietary software for development or
communication.
[0]
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Norman Rieß nor...@smash-net.org wrote:
I do not see the benefit either, it seems like that kind of thing the PR
department would come up with, which noone does actually like doing and
everyone is glad when it's over and can go back to work.
I honestly wonder
Le samedi 22 juin 2013 à 15:48 +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/06/13 01:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 09:35:54 Dennis Lan (dlan)
On 24/06/13 11:54, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le samedi 22 juin 2013 à 15:48 +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/06/13 01:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia
On 24.06.2013 08:31, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
I realise that by Gentoo is and will remain Free Software[0], what
is meant is the distribution and the source code. However, I think it
would be a bad example to use proprietary software for development or
communication.
So we shouldn't be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Legler schrieb:
On 24.06.2013 08:31, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
I realise that by Gentoo is and will remain Free Software[0], what
is meant is the distribution and the source code. However, I think it
would be a bad example to use
On 24.06.2013 12:01, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Alex Legler schrieb:
On 24.06.2013 08:31, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
I realise that by Gentoo is and will remain Free Software[0], what
is meant is the distribution and the source code. However, I think it
would be a bad example to use
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Norman Rieß nor...@smash-net.org wrote:
I do not see the benefit either, it seems like that kind of thing the PR
department would come up with, which noone does actually like
Le lundi 24 juin 2013 à 12:05 +0300, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
On 24/06/13 11:54, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le samedi 22 juin 2013 à 15:48 +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Pavlos, I understand what you mean, I'm just saying that organizing a real
video conference takes its toil. And just opening a webcam and talking is
just going to give an amateurish feeling that could be more detrimental
than not.
Can you please tell us if you have _any_ experience at all with
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.orgwrote:
To be clear, the justification of USE=dmalloc being separated from
USE=debug is that it is so intrusive than anyone excepts a developer
would find it too cumbersome to attempt to debug a problem with the
application
On 24/06/2013 07:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
That's why I'd like to propose Gentoo Hangouts. Gentoo Hangouts will
be Google+ video Hangouts(video calls) held by teams or developers
independent of a team. The main goal is to have the teams introduce
themselves and discuss about different issues in
On 24 June 2013 11:54, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 24/06/2013 07:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
That's why I'd like to propose Gentoo Hangouts. Gentoo Hangouts will
be Google+ video Hangouts(video calls) held by teams or developers
independent of a team. The main goal is to
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
And unlike IRC meetings, you can cannot multitask, say making your dinner
while discussing this or that feature.
Honestly, that bit is a two-edged sword. I was just musing with the
Trustees yesterday how it seems
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:04:04PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 24 June 2013 11:54, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 24/06/2013 07:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
That's why I'd like to propose Gentoo Hangouts. Gentoo Hangouts will
be Google+ video Hangouts(video calls) held
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:14:44AM +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
A VC is a full commitment, and its attractiveness is often much higher
_before_ you use it..
Agreed.
I have found that if I am on a voice chat with someone, say on skype, it
requires my full attention, especially since I use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/06/13 03:53 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
On 21/06/13 03:27 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
21.06.2013 23:22, Sergey Popov пишет:
2) package has dead upstream, does not build with current
gcc/glibc/binutils/whatever and can not be fixed - bug is
closed as
Tom Wijsman posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:24:27 +0200 as excerpted:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:33:53 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
TL;DR: SSDs help. =:^)
TL;DR: SSDs help, but they don't solve the underlying problem. =:-(
Well, there's the long-term fix to the underlying
Hi!
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
I've worked on a VC system most of last year and I now go
through regular conferences... it's barely okay from a work
point of view, it takes lots of time to organize so you don't
want to do that every single day for sure.
It depends how
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.orgwrote:
It depends how you run it. We have teams having a video thing
open during the day with there geographically-diverse other team
members and it works well for them. For those teams, it also
improves cohesion.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:04:04PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
I like the idea. It might help bring developers and users closer.
Me too, if I can ever contribute to it, or help users with their Gentoo
(Hardened/SELinux/IMA/EVM/...) through it, I'll be happy to work with it.
Wkr,
Sven
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:27:19 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
I have one; it's great to help make my boot short, but it isn't
really a great improvement for the Portage tree. Better I/O isn't a
solution to computational complexity; it doesn't deal with the CPU
bottleneck.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 03:48:29PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:10:27PM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote:
Fabio Erculiani wrote:
- only init is currently handled by eselect-init, which is now using a
very small wrapper POSIX shell script to redirect the calls to the
repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
On 06/24/2013 10:40 PM, Michael Sterrett wrote:
repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
Does it make sense to have with ebuilds in the tree with unsatisfiable
dependencies? If so, should we distinguish between conditional and
unconditional dependencies? Note that if the dependencies
25 matches
Mail list logo
