Tom Wijsman wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:25:42PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 14:09:57 -0500
Matthew Summers quantumsumm...@gentoo.org wrote:
If the patchset patches the kernel's core, it doesn't matter what
CONFIG_* option is set the core
Michael Weber wrote:
Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Now I'm confused because gentoo-sources is gentoo specific. It
contains stuff that we need in gentoo but other distros do not
need, like our end-to-end support for certain xattr namespaces. If
you remove these then we must either 1) maintain
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:45:55 +0100
Steven J. Long sl...@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
Tom Wijsman wrote:
Earlier I mentioned 3) The patch should not affect the build by
default.; if it does, we have to adjust it to not do that,
this is something that can be easily scripted.
If it
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 21:16:07 +0300
Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org wrote:
udev's case:
It's _not_ the kernel which upgrade breaks user's system. Why do you
try to fix it? If you want to save user's box - make check at
pre-install time. Otherwise it will break.
Won't work for stage3's
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:06:07 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 21:16:07 +0300
Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org wrote:
udev's case:
It's _not_ the kernel which upgrade breaks user's system. Why do you
try to fix it? If you want to save user's box - make
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 16:52:37 +0300
Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:06:07 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 21:16:07 +0300
Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org wrote:
udev's case:
It's _not_ the kernel which upgrade
Oh, so It has nothing to do with upgrade path.
My apologies
--
Sergei
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
as Ondrej Grover pointed out on [1], the font.eclass installs font
files and indexes (font.dir, fonts.scale) into sub-dirs of
/usr/share/fonts/, e.g. /usr/share/fonts/terminus.
These directories are naturally not in the fontpath of Xorg
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:42:56PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote
With USE=-experimental (which will be the default) they are excluded by
default, after enabling that the user can exclude patches by setting
UNIPATCH_EXCLUDE through the package.env mechanism.
Here's my user, not-a-developer,
Tom Wijsman wrote:
Steven J. Long wrote:
If it does [affect the build by default] then it should never be
applied, unless the user specifically asks for it, imo, and the
resultant kernel is labelled -exp as you suggest.
Yes, we are going to introduce an experimental USE flag for this.
Walter Dnes wrote:
Tom Wijsman wrote
With USE=-experimental (which will be the default) they are excluded by
default, after enabling that the user can exclude patches by setting
UNIPATCH_EXCLUDE through the package.env mechanism.
Assume that there are 50 different patches available. I
11 matches
Mail list logo
