Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: check-reqs* vs CFLAGS=-g

2013-08-02 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-08-02, o godz. 02:07:18 Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net napisał(a): Michał Górny posted on Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:33:48 +0200 as excerpted: LLVM has peek build space consumption around: - 400-550M without clang (depending on targets), - 950-1200M with clang, - 16G with clang

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: check-reqs* vs CFLAGS=-g

2013-08-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Unlikely you screwed up, -O0 makes bigger code than -O2 almost in every case; then -g annotates it. I'm expecting -ggdb to take some few GBs more. It'll be the same if not worse with almost all software, -g3 would make it even worse. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu —

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

2013-08-02 Thread Luca Barbato
On 01/08/13 04:48, William Hubbs wrote: I would rather not carry distro-specific patches forever to support something like this, so please forward your patches upstream. The code is in a public git, it is even not written by me, anybody can forward it to upstream... lu

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

2013-08-02 Thread Steven J. Long
Pacho Ramos wrote: How the /usr in other partition ended finally then? I though that, since there are a lot of things in / that rely in others in /usr, people were supposed to either use initramfs or busybox to get /usr mounted As Rich said, lvm doesn't link outside rootfs so it's not an

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

2013-08-02 Thread Duncan
Steven J. Long posted on Fri, 02 Aug 2013 12:31:08 +0100 as excerpted: As Rich said, lvm doesn't link outside rootfs so it's not an issue: you only really need an initramfs if rootfs is on lvm/encrypted/raid, or you need udev to get through localmount. Or, unfortunately, for root on

Re: [gentoo-dev] check-reqs* vs CFLAGS=-g

2013-08-02 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Donnerstag 01 August 2013, 13:33:48 schrieb Michał Górny: - 1.2G for -O2 (as shown above), - 12G for -O0 -g. I thought -O0 was generally discouraged, even for debugging?! -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer kde, sci, arm, tex, printing

Re: [gentoo-dev] check-reqs* vs CFLAGS=-g

2013-08-02 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-08-02, o godz. 14:08:46 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Am Donnerstag 01 August 2013, 13:33:48 schrieb Michał Górny: - 1.2G for -O2 (as shown above), - 12G for -O0 -g. I thought -O0 was generally discouraged, even for debugging?! Depends on what you

Re: [gentoo-dev] check-reqs* vs CFLAGS=-g

2013-08-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.orgwrote: I thought -O0 was generally discouraged, even for debugging?! As Michał said, it all depends on what you want to debug. I would say that for 90% of issues you *do not* want to use -O0. Your code might not even

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

2013-08-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Steven J. Long sl...@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk wrote: It's funny how you always discuss those two options and consistently fail to mention the one option that allows people who never needed an initramfs before to continue without one, and still use udev in line

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: git.eclass

2013-08-02 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org (2 Aug 2013) # This eclass has been superseded by git-2 eclass and will be removed # on 2013-09-02. Please modify your ebuilds to use git-2 instead. # Bug #479474. git.eclass -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon

2013-08-02 Thread William Hubbs
All, This message is an announcement and a reminder. OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few days. If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the standard disclaimer applies: remember that you might be subject to breakage. I do not know of any breakage personally. It does work

[gentoo-dev] Global USE flag: git

2013-08-02 Thread Michael Weber
Hello, we have subversion and cvs ad global flags, but not git (or hg|mercurial). I'm about to add the 14th [1] package using this flag. I propose a description git - Enable git (version control system) support in use.desc. Yes/No? Timeout in 7 days. Michael [1] % grep :git