Dnia 2013-11-29, o godz. 17:33:18
Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org napisał(a):
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 09:49:03AM +0100, Lars Wendler wrote:
I think there's some confusion on what the -d option actually does, so
let me cite the relevant parts from man 8 ntpd:
[...]
Now let's discuss if
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Conditionally patching openntpd in the ebuild if a system is using
openrc is certainly the way to go.
You mean unconditionally here, right?
No.
Because pid files should be there, full stop.
With openrc sure but neither want nor need them with service
Peter Stuge wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Conditionally patching openntpd in the ebuild if a system is using
openrc is certainly the way to go.
You mean unconditionally here, right?
No.
Or maybe yes. :) The condition I refered to is that the system is
using openrc. Sorry if my
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (30 Nov 2013)
# Masked for removal in a month due to ruby18 deprecation.
# Only available for ruby18 which is deprecated, bug 483600
app-i18n/rskkserv
# Only available for ruby18, maintainer needed
app-office/rabbit
# Only available for ruby18, no dependencies
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Or maybe yes. :) The condition I refered to is that the system is
using openrc. Sorry if my weak language skills caused confusion!
What I mean is that it would be stupid to have USE=openrc to apply such a
patch. Either the
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 09:14:30AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
You know, usually it's enough to ping upstream. AFAIR there was
a similar problem in irqbalance, and they have added plain
'--foreground' for us.
I don't know there really is an upstream for portable openntpd right
now, there's
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 04:20:09PM +, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
If you really don't want PID files (and it probably means you have
never had to deal with medium-scale deployments, but never mind), you
can make it so that `-p` is an optional parameter, and if not passed
no pidfile is
