Hello, all.
Some time ago I wrote a small tool called install-mask. As the name
suggests, it was intended to help with manipulating INSTALL_MASK.
I think that its most important feature was ability to use pre-defined
mask lists to easily mask unwanted directories without getting into
the details.
On 01/10/2014 11:14 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 10 January 2014 22:20, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it
wrong
wouldn't really care which herd pam itself is owned by.
I'm not saying it makes a
El sáb, 11-01-2014 a las 10:57 +, Markos Chandras escribió:
On 01/10/2014 11:14 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 10 January 2014 22:20, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it
wrong
wouldn't really care which
If we limit it to the virtual, pam and pambase, I'm happy to stick
maintaining them, the others I don't use, which is why I don't care about
them as much.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 11 January 2014 11:01, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org
El sáb, 11-01-2014 a las 11:07 +, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
If we limit it to the virtual, pam and pambase, I'm happy to stick
maintaining them, the others I don't use, which is why I don't care
about them as much.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu —
On 01/11/2014 11:07 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
If we limit it to the virtual, pam and pambase, I'm happy to stick
maintaining them, the others I don't use, which is why I don't care about
them as much.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 2014.01.10 16:48, Igor wrote:
Hello All,
Thank you for all our feedback!
[snip]
--
Best regards,
Igor mailto:lanthrus...@gmail.com
Igor,
You don't need anyones permission to start an OSS project.
Just do it. If its useful, it will get used.
Here, you
Michał Górny wrote:
INSTALL_MASK=systemd bash-completion
What are your thoughts?
It seems like this will generally duplicate all -USE flags.
Would it make sense to instead have a single setting which changes
the meaning of USE to be that everything not USEd is install-masked?
Rather than
Hi, Igor
LTHR lanthrus...@gmail.com writes:
Portage QOS
Hi All,
What do you think about implementing this:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=7477494
I've system design in my head and could write it down with the
implementation details.
Then may be we could all review it and get
Peter Stuge posted on Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:53:38 +0100 as excerpted:
Michał Górny wrote:
INSTALL_MASK=systemd bash-completion
What are your thoughts?
It seems like this will generally duplicate all -USE flags.
Would it make sense to instead have a single setting which changes the
I've got an additional proposal: It would be interesting if this
feature could also make use of the LINGUAS var for selectively
filtering /usr/share/man and and /usr/share/locale, as most ebuilds
don't respect this variable natively.
--
Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de
GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 16:56:37
Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de napisał(a):
I've got an additional proposal: It would be interesting if this
feature could also make use of the LINGUAS var for selectively
filtering /usr/share/man and and /usr/share/locale, as most ebuilds
don't respect this
On 11/01/2014 18:01, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 16:56:37
Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de napisał(a):
I've got an additional proposal: It would be interesting if this
feature could also make use of the LINGUAS var for selectively
filtering /usr/share/man and and
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:01:34 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
That's a side goal.
I was thinking of something like:
INSTALL_MASK=linguas -linguas_XX
that would remove all linguas except for language XX.
That would be enough for me. A bit of a duplication of information,
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 17:21:46
Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de napisał(a):
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:01:34 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
That's a side goal.
I was thinking of something like:
INSTALL_MASK=linguas -linguas_XX
that would remove all linguas except for
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 18:15:09
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com napisał(a):
A far better method from a user point of view is to install the linguas
the user explicitly asked for. Your proposal as worded will be taken at
first glance to mean install all linguas, but not XX as most users
On 11/01/2014 18:52, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 18:15:09
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com napisał(a):
A far better method from a user point of view is to install the linguas
the user explicitly asked for. Your proposal as worded will be taken at
first glance to mean
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 19:11:21
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com napisał(a):
On 11/01/2014 18:52, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 18:15:09
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com napisał(a):
A far better method from a user point of view is to install the linguas
the
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Ben Kohler bkoh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.orgwrote:
I would like to make it a directory instead of a single file, and extend
the internal syntax.
I'm not sure I see much real value in allowing
Duncan wrote:
INSTALL_MASK=systemd bash-completion
What are your thoughts?
It seems like this will generally duplicate all -USE flags.
Would it make sense to instead have a single setting which changes the
meaning of USE to be that everything not USEd is install-masked?
No,
On 10 January 2014 17:58, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Just to be clear, what is the exact use case for this? I can't think
of a really good reason to manipulate mirror lists in subsequent repos.
For Perl, in ::gentoo , its considered not too optimal to have backpan
listed as a
On 12 January 2014 08:16, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
diff ( grep cpan
/var/paludis/repositories/perl-git/profiles/thirdpartymirrors ) ( grep
cpan /usr/portage/profiles/thirdpartymirrors )
Oh... also, there's a wide variety of location specific CPAN mirrors
available that
While I'm adding USE defaults to toolchain.eclass and moving them out of the
profiles, I thought now would be a good time to review a couple default flag
settings.
mudflap:
This is currently enabled by default but I'd like to disable it. It controls
libmudflap and the -fmudflap flag. I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/2014 12:09 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 22:07 -0500, Chris Reffett wrote:
Hi all, Attached is a patch to test if Portage is going to write
to a read-only filesystem and print out the list of filesystems
that need to be
On 10 January 2014 17:58, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Just to be clear, what is the exact use case for this? I can't think
of a really good reason to manipulate mirror lists in subsequent repos.
For Perl, in ::gentoo , its considered not too optimal to have backpan
listed as a
On 12 January 2014 08:16, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
diff ( grep cpan
/var/paludis/repositories/perl-git/profiles/thirdpartymirrors ) ( grep
cpan /usr/portage/profiles/thirdpartymirrors )
Oh... also, there's a wide variety of location specific CPAN mirrors
available that
26 matches
Mail list logo
