Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-15 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo in RDEPEND. This sounds a bit like a one-time solution for a

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-15 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/15/2014 04:42 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo in RDEPEND.

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-15 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
On 10/15/2014 04:42 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo in RDEPEND.

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-15 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-dicts/gnuvd

2014-10-15 Thread Michael Palimaka
# Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org (15 Oct 2014) # No longer compatible with online service it depends on. # Dead upstream. Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #451868. app-dicts/gnuvd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing a blocker from a stable package

2014-10-15 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
that's intended. repoman warns for missing *needed* dependencies, but won't bother for unknown blockers exactly for cases like this. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On 15 October 2014 01:25, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote: On 10/13/2014

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add gcc-specs-stack-check() to toolchain-funcs.eclass

2014-10-15 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 10/12/14 17:22, Anthony G. Basile wrote: On 10/12/14 15:55, Anthony G. Basile wrote: On 10/12/14 15:46, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Dan Douglas wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote: +# Returns true if gcc builds with

Re: virtual/{posix,stage1,2,3} Was: [gentoo-dev] Add bc back to the stage3

2014-10-15 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:31 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:22:18PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: In a similar vein, would releng be open to moving stage1/2/3 package sets to virtual packages or package sets?

Re: virtual/{posix,stage1,2,3} Was: [gentoo-dev] Add bc back to the stage3

2014-10-15 Thread W. Trevor King
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:13:45AM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: For stage1 and stage2 the *order* we build packages is relevant. Is this really true? The stage1 is being built with ROOT, so it's only using the seed stage3 packages. It's hard to have cyclic dependencies when you're

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Package description index file format for faster emerge search actions

2014-10-15 Thread Paul Varner
On 10/14/14 02:40, Zac Medico wrote: Hi, As we all know, emerge --search/--searchdesc actions are embarrassingly slow (from most users' perspectives, anyway), especially in comparison to external tools like eix and esearch. Wouldn't it be nice if the performance of emerge's search