[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] multibuild.eclass: make sure BUILD_DIR exists before pushd'ing into it.

2014-10-23 Thread Davide Pesavento
Index: multibuild.eclass === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/multibuild.eclass,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 multibuild.eclass --- multibuild.eclass 10 May 2014 21:36:49 - 1.18 +++ multibuild.eclass 23 Oct

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] multilib-minimal.eclass: use run_in_build_dir().

2014-10-23 Thread Davide Pesavento
Index: multilib-minimal.eclass === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/multilib-minimal.eclass,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.9 multilib-minimal.eclass --- multilib-minimal.eclass 2 May 2014 16:16:37 - 1.9 +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] multilib-minimal.eclass: use run_in_build_dir().

2014-10-23 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-10-23, o godz. 22:31:39 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Index: multilib-minimal.eclass === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/multilib-minimal.eclass,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.9

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] emerge --search: use description index

2014-10-23 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:51:05 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: This updated patch changes the index format to use spaces instead of commas, for readability. This example given in man/portage.5: sys-apps/sed 4.2 4.2.1 4.2.1-r1 4.2.2: Super-useful stream editor sys-apps/usleep 0.1: A

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] emerge --search: use description index

2014-10-23 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/23/2014 01:55 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: What I wonder, is why the following two classes aren't in the portage namespace. There is far too much logic embedded in the _emerge namespace. Most probably under the portage/dpapi subpkg. Looking at them, they do look very similar to the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH 3/3] package.bashrc: per profile, per-package bashrc mechanism

2014-10-23 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/06/2014 02:01 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:57:45 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 10/06/2014 10:38 AM, Bertrand Simonnet wrote: Michal, Zac, did you have time to look at this series of patches ? I've reviewed the whole series, and it all looks good to