Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: app-eselect category

2015-03-28 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Yes, +1 On Mar 29, 2015 12:59 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 29 March 2015 at 04:47, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: Now the number of eselect-* packages in the app-admin category has grown to 52. Should we create a new app-eselect category for them? I think this is a

[gentoo-dev] Last-rite x11-themes/gtk-engines-qtcurve

2015-03-28 Thread Ben de Groot
# Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org (29 Mar 2015) # Merged with qtcurve-qt4 into x11-themes/qtcurve (with gtk useflag) # Removal in 30 days. See also bug #544406. x11-themes/gtk-engines-qtcurve -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should Gentoo do https by default?

2015-03-28 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 27.03.2015 15:33, Hanno Böck wrote: I think defaulting the net to HTTPS is a big step for more security and I think Gentoo should join the trend here. Yes please! Sebastian

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/emul-linux-x86*

2015-03-28 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org (14 Sep 2014) # on behalf of gx86-multilib project multi...@gentoo.org # Mask emul-linux-x86 packages along with unported old versions # of reverse dependencies for removal in 60 days, bug #544876. # Please use multilib ebuilds with abi_x86_32 instead.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: app-eselect category

2015-03-28 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 21:47:04 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: I had already brought this up a long time ago [1] but it wasn't done then, mainly because the thread drifted into a discussion of the category's name. (Does anyone remember the Universal Select Tool which was a GSoC

[gentoo-dev] RFC: app-eselect category

2015-03-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
I had already brought this up a long time ago [1] but it wasn't done then, mainly because the thread drifted into a discussion of the category's name. (Does anyone remember the Universal Select Tool which was a GSoC project in 2009? :) Now the number of eselect-* packages in the app-admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-28 Thread William Hubbs
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 08:51:52AM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: On 27 March 2015 at 00:51, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions according to our small

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/jna-posix

2015-03-28 Thread James Le Cuirot
# James Le Cuirot ch...@gentoo.org (28 Mar 2015) # Formerly required by NetBeans. Upstream has been dead for # years. Removal in 30 days. dev-java/jna-posix -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer pgpIJ0tOffEY6.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: app-eselect category

2015-03-28 Thread Ben de Groot
On 29 March 2015 at 04:47, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: Now the number of eselect-* packages in the app-admin category has grown to 52. Should we create a new app-eselect category for them? I think this is a good idea. So +1 from me. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: app-eselect category

2015-03-28 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-03-28, o godz. 21:47:04 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a): I had already brought this up a long time ago [1] but it wasn't done then, mainly because the thread drifted into a discussion of the category's name. (Does anyone remember the Universal Select Tool which was a GSoC

[gentoo-dev] Version Bumps

2015-03-28 Thread Justin Lecher (jlec)
Dear fellow devs, The following behavior is not an appropriate procedure for a version bump! Seems like a trivial version bump, simply renaming the xxx ebuild works. Please check packages more carefully e.g. comparing configure.ac, Makefile.am, README, INSTALL, setup.py, requirements.txt and

[gentoo-dev] Cluster tinderbox poc

2015-03-28 Thread Magnus Granberg
Hi As some of you may know, I have been working on code for a tinderbox with frontend support. I think its time to move it to a offcial project. The Proof-Of-Concept (poc) is almost ready, but it still have alot of the frontend left to do. You can see the logs and summit bugsreports and chose

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Review: Apache AddHandler news item

2015-03-28 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hi! I was wondering about the same thing, too. I can commit it as revision 1 for a workaround. If you have some time, please take this question/issue further with the related software and people. Thanks in advance, Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should Gentoo do https by default?

2015-03-28 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 +1 for everything. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlUWwDgACgkQRtClrXBQc7XyRQEAh2fJrr9aW9kLLa+a4hmwOT80

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should Gentoo do https by default?

2015-03-28 Thread Vladimir Smirnov
Just my 5c: On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:18:24 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: * Make sure all use modern HTTPS features, including: * OCSP Stapling SSLUseStapling is Apache 2.3+ only, and that isn't stable yet. You can always set up Nginx, if not instead, but at least in