[gentoo-dev] Last rites: various ruby19-only packages

2015-04-26 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (26 Apr 2015) # Ruby packages that only work with ruby19. Masked for removal in 30 # days. # # Only compatible with ruby19. app-misc/booh # Only compatible with ruby19. New versions bring in many new # dependencies and this would require a dedicated maintainer.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Hey arch teams, we need your input!

2015-04-26 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:04:11 -0400 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Currently, a problem is that everybody uses different formatting for stabilization bug reports making them more difficult to be parsed. For

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: c++14 global USE flag

2015-04-26 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 25 April 2015 at 16:57, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Of course, one thing that could make the process faster would be if C++ based packages were marked some way. revdep-rebuild --soname 'libstdc\+\+.so.*' should do the trick. Stuff that does not link the library (statically linked

Re: [gentoo-dev] Hey arch teams, we need your input!

2015-04-26 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 11-04-2015 a las 21:50 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: Hi all, the debate about arches, keywording and stabilization procedures is coming up again. People have told me that the whole debate seems to turn into some sort of arch-team bashing. That is definitely not the plan.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Hey arch teams, we need your input!

2015-04-26 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Currently, a problem is that everybody uses different formatting for stabilization bug reports making them more difficult to be parsed. For clarity, are we talking about parsing by a human brain, or parsing by a computer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Hey arch teams, we need your input!

2015-04-26 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 26-04-2015 a las 08:04 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió: On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Currently, a problem is that everybody uses different formatting for stabilization bug reports making them more difficult to be parsed. For clarity, are we

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-04-26 23:59 UTC

2015-04-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2015-04-26 23:59 UTC. Removals: net-mail/git-mailz 2015-04-22 14:49:11 yac games-kids/memonix-bin 2015-04-23 22:44:23 mr_bones_ app-admin/chef

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Make the USE variable readonly (bug 325009)

2015-04-26 Thread Zac Medico
This requires the EBUILD_FORCE_TEST code from dyn_test to execute before USE is declared readonly. X-Gentoo-Bug: 325009 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325009 --- bin/ebuild.sh | 10 +- bin/phase-functions.sh | 9 + 2 files changed, 10