Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v4] xattr: centralize the various shims in one place

2015-06-12 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/06/15 09:06, Brian Dolbec wrote: Personally, I'd prefer you stay with tabs, even if it does not line up exactly with the ( ignoring personal preferences for tab settings ( 1 tab = 4 spaces,...) Mixing tabs spaces is a poor idea, so I

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: go packages vs repositories

2015-06-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:02:41PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/12/2015 09:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:18:29AM -0700, Patrick McLean wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:54:04 -0500 William Hubbs

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: go packages vs repositories

2015-06-12 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/12/2015 10:49 PM, William Hubbs wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:02:41PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 ... That said, I understand the structure. I don't like it, but I

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: go packages vs repositories

2015-06-12 Thread Tianon Gravi
On 12 June 2015 at 13:49, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: Does anyone know how third party go packages are being handled on other distros? In Debian at least, each Go package is being packaged individually (using version numbers where possible, but otherwise using fun

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: go packages vs repositories

2015-06-12 Thread Duncan
Patrick McLean posted on Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:18:29 -0700 as excerpted: We could make go ebuilds simply install their sources to something like /usr/share/go/${PN}-${SLOT}. I'm staying out of the general discussion, but this... These are sources, please use a location within the PM's sources

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: go packages vs repositories

2015-06-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:18:29AM -0700, Patrick McLean wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:54:04 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, in looking at some of the Go ebuilds we have in the tree, I see that some of them, for example go-tools, have multiple Go packages in a

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: go packages vs repositories

2015-06-12 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/12/2015 09:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:18:29AM -0700, Patrick McLean wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:54:04 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: .. Since the Go compiler bundles all the necessary

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: go packages vs repositories

2015-06-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:39:57PM +, Duncan wrote: Patrick McLean posted on Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:18:29 -0700 as excerpted: We could make go ebuilds simply install their sources to something like /usr/share/go/${PN}-${SLOT}. I'm staying out of the general discussion, but this...

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog qt4-build-multilib.eclass

2015-06-12 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2015-06-12, o godz. 01:44:17 Davide Pesavento (pesa) p...@gentoo.org napisał(a): pesa15/06/12 01:44:17 Modified: ChangeLog qt4-build-multilib.eclass Log: Don't die when trying to rmdir

[gentoo-dev] rfc: go packages vs repositories

2015-06-12 Thread William Hubbs
All, in looking at some of the Go ebuilds we have in the tree, I see that some of them, for example go-tools, have multiple Go packages in a single repository. This means that something like: go get -d -u -t golang.org/x/tools will fail. There is an issue opened upstream about this [1]. My

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: go packages vs repositories

2015-06-12 Thread Patrick McLean
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:54:04 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, in looking at some of the Go ebuilds we have in the tree, I see that some of them, for example go-tools, have multiple Go packages in a single repository. This means that something like: go get -d -u -t