On 3 August 2015 at 01:33, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:34:51 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote:
[...]
This policy will allow to USE both qt versions whichever is
available preferring newer one. Quite reasonable approach.
Alternatives (^^() and ??()) will require
On 3 August 2015 at 09:37, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
I find setting USE=qt4 -qt5 a lot more obvious than having USE=qt (why
not
USE=X ?) which then does different things based on another useflag,
sometimes.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
I want to use fooplayer and bargrapher which are two qt-based
applications. fooplayer only supports qt4, and bargrapher only
supports qt5. What USE flags should I set, without restorting to
per-package flags?
These
On 3 August 2015 at 11:30, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
I want to use fooplayer and bargrapher which are two qt-based
applications. fooplayer only supports qt4, and bargrapher only
supports qt5. What USE flags
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 19:27:02 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Long story short, this is USE=gtk once again. GNOME team had a
policy that handled the case cleanly and QA outvoted it in favor of
Qt-like policy. Then Qt team figured out their policy was unfriendly,
and 'fixed' it with this ugly hack...
Dnia 2015-08-02, o godz. 21:21:03
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 19:27:02 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Long story short, this is USE=gtk once again. GNOME team had a
policy that handled the case cleanly and QA outvoted it in favor of
Qt-like policy. Then Qt
On 8/2/15 7:27 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
What would be really clean is USE='qt qt5' (or 'qt qt4'), alike GNOME
team policy. USE=qt would mean 'any version of Qt, if optional', and
qt4/qt5 would be used to switch between Qt4/Qt5. If Qt would be
obligatory, no USE=qt would apply. If only one Qt
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:34:51 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote:
Recently some team members of the Qt project have adopted these ebuild
policies: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Policies
I have an issue with the policy adopted under Requires one of two Qt
versions. In my opinion, in the case
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Ben de Groot wrote:
Recently some team members of the Qt project have adopted these
ebuild policies: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Policies
I have an issue with the policy adopted under Requires one of two
Qt versions. In my opinion, in the case where a package
Dnia 2015-08-03, o godz. 00:34:51
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Recently some team members of the Qt project have adopted these ebuild
policies: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Policies
I have an issue with the policy adopted under Requires one of two Qt
versions. In my
Recently some team members of the Qt project have adopted these ebuild
policies: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Policies
I have an issue with the policy adopted under Requires one of two Qt
versions. In my opinion, in the case where a package offers a choice
between qt4 or qt5, we should
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 20:35:27 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-02, o godz. 21:21:03
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 19:27:02 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Long story short, this is USE=gtk once again. GNOME team had a
policy that handled the case
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is a clean solution for developers and maintainers, but not
for ordinary users — they will confused by qt qt4 qt5: what is
'qt', how is it different from 'qt4' and 'qt5'. What you are really
doing is implementing
^^ has the pleasant side effect of being easier to read, as a user. The user
receives a message saying at-most-one-of instead of some convoluted other
expression that they don't understand.
I am all for the use of ^^ add the default for this reason.
Additionally, ?? has the same effect of
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-03, o godz. 00:34:51
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Recently some team members of the Qt project have adopted these ebuild
policies: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Policies
I have an
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is a clean solution for developers and maintainers, but not
for ordinary users — they will confused by qt qt4 qt5: what is
'qt', how is it
# Patrice Clement monsie...@gentoo.org (3 Aug 2015)
# Broken and no releases in 10 years (!).
# Removal in 30 days. See bug #451790.
www-servers/skunkweb
On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 17:14:47 -0400
NP-Hardass np-hard...@gentoo.org wrote:
^^ has the pleasant side effect of being easier to read, as a user.
The user receives a message saying at-most-one-of instead of some
convoluted other expression that they don't understand.
I am all for the use of ^^
Dnia 2015-08-02, o godz. 21:50:25
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 20:35:27 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-02, o godz. 21:21:03
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 19:27:02 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Long story
Our bug queue has 96 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2015-08-02 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
games-fps/tremulous 2015-07-30 15:17:39 mr_bones_
Additions:
dev-ml/ocaml-base64 2015-07-27 07:49:45 aballier
dev-util/Orange
On Sunday 02 August 2015 22:22:28 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 17:14:47 -0400
NP-Hardass np-hard...@gentoo.org wrote:
^^ has the pleasant side effect of being easier to read, as a user.
The user receives a message saying at-most-one-of instead of some
convoluted other
On Monday 03 August 2015 00:34:51 Ben de Groot wrote:
Recently some team members of the Qt project have adopted these ebuild
policies: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Policies
I have an issue with the policy adopted under Requires one of two Qt
versions. In my opinion, in the case
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
I find setting USE=qt4 -qt5 a lot more obvious than having USE=qt (why not
USE=X ?) which then does different things based on another useflag,
sometimes. Maybe. It's horribly inconsistent and even might change result over
24 matches
Mail list logo
